Assessment of Multi-Step CADIS Parameter Sensitivity to Neutron Flux Spectrum in Shutdown Dose Rate Calculations
Journal Article
·
· Transactions of the American Nuclear Society
OSTI ID:23042767
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory, P.O. Box 2008, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 (United States)
- University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1500 Engineering Dr., Madison, WI, 53706 Address (United States)
Shutdown dose rate (SDDR) analysis requires (a) a neutron transport calculation to estimate neutron flux fields, (b) an activation calculation to compute radionuclide inventories and associated photon sources, and (c) a photon transport calculation to estimate final dose rate. In some applications, accurate full-scale Monte Carlo (MC) SDDR simulations are needed for very large systems with massive amounts of shielding materials. For example, SDDR assessments are required throughout the biological shield (bio-shield) of the ITER experimental facility to evaluate the required waiting period after the shutdown of ITER and to identify the locations where human accessibility should be prohibited. The bio-shield is a large cylindrical concrete structure (30 m tall and 34 m in diameter) surrounding the very complex tokamak machine. Determining the effects on SDDR of important factors, such as the cross talk (interactions) between the different ports of ITER, is possible only through full-scale simulations that involve all the complex inner details of the ITER tokamak machine. These simulations are impractical because calculation of space- and energy-dependent neutron fluxes throughout the structural materials is needed to estimate the distribution of radioisotopes causing the SDDR. Determining a good importance function that can be used in biasing a neutron MC calculation for SDDR is complicated because it is difficult to explicitly express the SDDR response function, which depends on subsequent computational steps. The Multi-Step Consistent Adjoint Driven Importance Sampling (MS-CADIS) hybrid MC/deterministic method was developed to speed up the SDDR MC neutron transport calculation using an importance function that represents the neutron importance to the final SDDR. The MS-CADIS method uses the CADIS method, which has been Notice: This manuscript has been authored by UT-Battelle, LLC, under Contract No. DE-AC0500OR22725 with the U.S. Department of Energy. The United States Government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the United States Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, world-wide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for the United States Government purposes. The Department of Energy will provide public access to these results of federally sponsored research in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan (http://energy.gov/downloads/doe-public-access-plan). successfully used for more than a decade in radiation shielding applications to generate consistent source biasing and weight window (WW) variance reduction parameters to accelerate continuous-energy MC simulations. However, because MS-CADIS focuses on multi-step shielding calculations such as SDDR calculations, it develops an importance function for the initial radiation transport calculation (e.g., the neutron calculations in SDDR simulations) that represents the importance of particles to the final response of the overall simulation. To develop this importance function, the MS-CADIS method uses an adjoint calculation with a specific neutron adjoint source that represents the neutron's contribution to the final SDDR. Brute force calculation of the MS-CADIS neutron adjoint source requires a deterministic neutron transport calculation coupled with activation calculations in each element of the deterministic mesh. These calculations are needed to determine the MS-CADIS parameter for the neutron interactions that produce radioisotopes contributing to the SDDR. The MS-CADIS parameter is the microscopic cross section of the radioisotope-producing interaction, multiplied by the mass of this radioisotope existing at the end of the irradiation and decay scenario, and divided by the steady-state rate of the interaction. Because the activation calculations are performed for each radionuclide in each mesh element, implementation of the MS-CADIS method can be computationally expensive. However, these neutron transport and activation calculations are not needed if we assume that the radioisotopes are created due to single neutron interactions and their concentrations do not change as a result of burnup by neutron irradiation. The use of this approximation, which renders the MS-CADIS parameter independent of the neutron flux, seems reasonable in calculating the MS-CADIS importance function because this function is needed only to speed up the MC calculation, not to calculate the final SDDR. In this work, we investigate the validity of this approximation by investigating the behavior of the MS-CADIS parameter as a function of the neutron flux spectra in the Fusion Evaluated Nuclear Data Library (FENDL) Neutronics and Shielding Benchmark problem that contains representative isotopes and flux environments of fusion energy systems. (authors)
- OSTI ID:
- 23042767
- Journal Information:
- Transactions of the American Nuclear Society, Journal Name: Transactions of the American Nuclear Society Vol. 115; ISSN 0003-018X
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
The Multi-Step CADIS Method for Shutdown Dose Rate Calculations and Uncertainty Propagation - Paper 137
Shutdown Dose Rate Analysis Using the Multi-Step CADIS Method
Analysis of Shutdown Dose Rate in Fusion Energy Systems Using Hybrid Monte Carlo/Deterministic Techniques - Paper 138
Conference
·
Mon Sep 15 00:00:00 EDT 2014
·
OSTI ID:23082955
Shutdown Dose Rate Analysis Using the Multi-Step CADIS Method
Journal Article
·
Wed Dec 31 19:00:00 EST 2014
· Fusion Science and Technology
·
OSTI ID:1214480
Analysis of Shutdown Dose Rate in Fusion Energy Systems Using Hybrid Monte Carlo/Deterministic Techniques - Paper 138
Conference
·
Mon Sep 15 00:00:00 EDT 2014
·
OSTI ID:23082956
Related Subjects
61 RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY
70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY
73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS
BIOLOGICAL SHIELDS
COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION
CONCRETES
CROSS SECTIONS
CYLINDRICAL CONFIGURATION
DOSE RATES
IRRADIATION
ITER TOKAMAK
MONTE CARLO METHOD
NEUTRON FLUX
NEUTRON TRANSPORT
NEUTRONS
NUCLEAR DATA COLLECTIONS
PHOTON TRANSPORT
RADIOISOTOPES
RESPONSE FUNCTIONS
SENSITIVITY
SHIELDING
SHIELDING MATERIALS
USA
70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY
73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS
BIOLOGICAL SHIELDS
COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION
CONCRETES
CROSS SECTIONS
CYLINDRICAL CONFIGURATION
DOSE RATES
IRRADIATION
ITER TOKAMAK
MONTE CARLO METHOD
NEUTRON FLUX
NEUTRON TRANSPORT
NEUTRONS
NUCLEAR DATA COLLECTIONS
PHOTON TRANSPORT
RADIOISOTOPES
RESPONSE FUNCTIONS
SENSITIVITY
SHIELDING
SHIELDING MATERIALS
USA