Panel Session 116: Waste Management from Remediation of Legacy Sites or Unplanned Releases
- Office of Remediation and Technology Innovation - OSRTI, US EPA (United States)
- TTV consulting services (Canada)
- Environmental Program Supervisor, Navajo Nation EPA (United States)
- Indigenous Relations, Nuclear Waste Management Organization (Canada)
- Zero Gravity Group (United States)
- International Atomic Energy Agency - IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA))
- Lodestone Environmental Consulting LLC (United States)
Past experiences have shown that there is often a disconnect between Indigenous societies and Western society. This disconnect can be attributed to different value systems between these two group and is not limited to the USA and Canada but also extends into Australia, New Zealand, and the Central Asia Republics (the 'five Stans'). The intent of this Panel Session to give voice to representatives from Indigenous communities, the challenges presented in remediation processes, and potential solutions. Standard risk assessment assumptions developed for Western societies often do not adequately address the cultural and spiritual values that may be unique to indigenous societies. This panel focused on the perspectives of Indigenous societies (e.g., Indian Tribes (US), First Nations (Canada)) related to risk assessment of environmental remediation challenges, including deep geological disposal of HLW and ILW, near-surface disposal of LLW and in-situ entombment of nuclear reactor components, and environmental remediation of abandoned uranium mines and historic wastes. Standard risk assessment assumptions often do not adequately address the cultural and spiritual values that may be unique to indigenous societies. Factoring those into a risk assessment that still meets regulatory requirements and policies such as reasonably anticipated land use at US EPA CERCLA sites can be challenging but has the potential to lead to a site or facility approach that is more accepted. Panelists with presentations: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Regulatory Process - A Path for Indigenous Knowledge? (Francis Cameron); Local Community Perceptions and Remediation Projects (Michelle Roberts); Indigenous Perspectives on Risk Assessment (Bob Watts); Navajo Superfund Program: Fundamental Law and Traditional Ecological Knowledge (Dariel Yazzie); Risk Assessment: Two Indigenous Approaches (Whitney Fraser)
- Research Organization:
- WM Symposia, Inc., PO Box 27646, 85285-7646 Tempe, AZ (United States)
- OSTI ID:
- 23027888
- Report Number(s):
- INIS-US--21-WM-20-PS116
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Trust and consequences: Role of community science, perceptions, values, and environmental justice in risk communication
Human health and ecological risk assessment of contaminated sites