Applying Technology and Experience to Ensure Safe In Situ Decommissioning - 19587
- Savannah River National Laboratory (United States)
- Longenecker and Associates (United States)
Permanent entombment of a radioactively contaminated facility as a decommissioning option (In Situ Decommissioning, ISD) has been completed for DOE facilities at the Savannah River Site (P and Reactors, HWCTR reactor), Hanford (U Canyon) and Idaho (CP-601/604),and is currently being considered for implementation at a limited number of selected DOE facilities as well as for the NPD and WR-1 reactors in Canada and various facilities in the United Kingdom. A general description of an ISD project encompasses an entombed facility which in some cases is limited to just the below-grade portion of a facility with the above-ground portion being decommissioned, packaged and disposed in a conventional manner. The entombed portions of the facility are of robust construction, generally of reinforced concrete exterior, that provides a migration barrier between internal contamination and the environment with significant internal void spaces backfilled or grouted. The scope of entombment may include ancillary equipment and structures and may contain radioactive and hazardous materials and contamination within the facility and waste imported from outside the facility. ISD is most often a permanent decommissioning end-state although in some instances (e.g. the U.K.) there may be a need to revisit the ISD facility after 300 years to effect traditional decommissioning. The defined completion (the end-state) of the decommissioned facility is therefore project-specific and in conformance with environmental approval processes and planned future activities. In all cases however, the final condition is passive, meaning that there are no requirements for ongoing operational systems or equipment within the decommissioned facility. ISD projects in the USA are presumed to be under indefinite institutional control of the U.S. Government. The regulatory framework in the U.S. is currently in place to provide assurance that the risk posed by an ISD facility is within regulatory acceptance criteria. (The framework in the U.K. and Canada is evolving towards that in the USA). Special emphasis is placed on the fact that an entombed facility is not considered a waste disposal facility; rather it is a decommissioning end-state option. ISD does not eliminate the need for effective and careful management of contaminated materials and structures, nor does it serve to abandon contaminated buildings in place. Further, ISD is safe and cost-effective for a relatively small number of facilities across the DOE Complex. This paper explores the current programmatic considerations and technical aspects of the ISD process and discuss the measures taken to ensure that an 'entombed' facility is safe for both site workers and the general population. (authors)
- Research Organization:
- WM Symposia, Inc., PO Box 27646, 85285-7646 Tempe, AZ (United States)
- OSTI ID:
- 23005441
- Report Number(s):
- INIS-US-21-WM-19587; TRN: US21V1368045775
- Resource Relation:
- Conference: WM2019: 45. Annual Waste Management Conference, Phoenix, AZ (United States), 3-7 Mar 2019; Other Information: Country of input: France; 8 refs.; available online at: https://www.xcdsystem.com/wmsym/2019/index.html
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
In Situ Decommissioning Sensor Network, Meso-Scale Test Bed - Phase 3 Fluid Injection Test Summary Report
In Situ Decommissioning (ISD) Concepts and Approaches for Excess Nuclear Facilities Decommissioning End State - 13367
Related Subjects
CANADA
DECOMMISSIONING
GROUTING
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
HWCTR REACTOR
IDAHO
IMPLEMENTATION
RADIOACTIVE WASTE DISPOSAL
RADIOACTIVE WASTES
RADIONUCLIDE KINETICS
REINFORCED CONCRETE
SAVANNAH RIVER PLANT
SURFACE CONTAMINATION
UNITED KINGDOM
WR-1 REACTOR