Well Design, Operation and Maintenance and Proactive Rehabilitation to Optimize Remediation Well Performance - 18605
- Arcadis U.S. Inc., Rapid City, SD (United States)
- Arcadis U.S. Inc., Novi, MI (United States)
Optimizing performance of extraction, injection and monitoring wells, which are integral components of groundwater remediation systems, result in lower life cycle costs and a higher probability of meeting project objectives. These wells provide the means to extract contaminated groundwater, inject reagents, treated water and clean water to create groundwater reaction/flushing zones, and to provide groundwater level, contaminant concentration and geochemical data. Initial costs associated with well installation and associated pipelines and treatment systems are significant project expenditures related to site remediation. However, the life cycle costs for wells are dominated by the long-term operation and maintenance (O and M) expenditures. Remediation wells are particularly susceptible to various types of fouling that impact well performance and, therefore, drive up operating costs. Simply defined, fouling is the result of any biological, geochemical or physical process that negatively impacts the intended performance of a remediation well. Fouling decreases well performance by effectively reducing hydraulic communication between the well and the surrounding formation. Oftentimes this occurs via clogging screens and/or gravel pack/formation pore space by bacterial or chemical byproducts and gases, which can lead to corrosion of metal components and spreading fouling deposits to pipelines and surface treatment systems. Ultimately, this results in reduced hydraulic performance in extraction and injection wells and result in erroneous water level and chemical parameter concentration measurements in monitoring wells. Remediation well fouling cannot be eliminated, and natural fouling processes are exacerbated by the installation and operation of remedial systems. Steps required to extend the life of remediation wells and to lower life cycle costs are discussed in this paper in order to establish the required approach to effective system management. These optimization approaches have been developed through years of operation and maintenance of complex large-scale plume remediation systems utilizing a variety of subsurface in-situ and ex-situ technologies. Remediation well performance can be improved by: - careful site characterization, - appropriate well design, - proper well installation and development, - thoughtful and adaptable operation and maintenance, - well performance maintenance tracking and, - proactive well rehabilitation. Clear understanding of the site hydro-stratigraphy and geochemical settings places constraints on the compatibility of well materials and the configurations of well screens. Proper well design, including collection and analysis (sieve/grain-size) of screen zone formation samples, assures that wells can be optimally installed, developed and redeveloped during well rehabilitation. Design considerations should include proper sizing of filter packs and well screens, casing/screen diameter, well material selection/compatibility, expected life/use, and well head configuration to allow for future access. Applying appropriate and effective well installation and development methods are of paramount importance and rely on a good understanding of site characteristics (e.g., geologic setting) as well as local drilling company expertise and experience. Different approaches to operation and maintenance can greatly affect the degree of fouling, these include limiting reagent concentrations, maintaining submerged well screens and filtering injection water to prevent the introduction of fouling enhancing constituents. Tracking well performance by monitoring changes in system operation and metrics such as specific capacity or injectivity for extraction and injection wells, respectively, or turbidity and chemical analyses for monitoring wells is key to identifying well maintenance issues early when well rehabilitation can be most effective. Proactive well rehabilitation can include mechanical brushing, surging and jetting, chemical treatment or other specialized approaches; however, the approach needs to be based on a site-specific understanding of the predominant fouling mechanisms. Collection and analyses of fouling deposits can provide guidance for selection of rehabilitation methods and chemicals that will be most effective. Application of these approaches have led to extended operational life for reagent injection wells, which can foul quickly, from months to years. Additionally, proper maintenance will often lead to increased and extended productivity of the well. For extraction wells, this translates to a higher sustainable yield, which means shorter cleanup times. Similarly, for injection wells, proper maintenance allows for the introduction of a greater volume of reagents over a shorter period, thus, shorter cleanup times that reduce overall project costs. (authors)
- Research Organization:
- WM Symposia, Inc., PO Box 27646, 85285-7646 Tempe, AZ (United States)
- OSTI ID:
- 22977859
- Report Number(s):
- INIS-US-20-WM-18605; TRN: US21V0487017904
- Resource Relation:
- Conference: WM2018: 44. Annual Waste Management Conference, Phoenix, AZ (United States), 18-22 Mar 2018; Other Information: Country of input: France; Available online at: https://www.xcdsystem.com/wmsym/2018/index.html
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Efforts to Improve Efficiency of Extraction Well Operation at the Fernald Preserve, Harrison, Ohio – 16177
Characterization and Well Remediation Strategies for Improved Long-term Pump and Treat System Injection Well Performance - 17272
Related Subjects
CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
CORROSION
DESIGN
FOULING
GEOCHEMISTRY
GROUND WATER
HYDRAULICS
INJECTION WELLS
INSTALLATION
LIFE-CYCLE COST
MAINTENANCE
MONITORING
OPERATING COST
OPERATION
OPTIMIZATION
PERFORMANCE
REAGENTS
REMEDIAL ACTION
STRATIGRAPHY
SURFACE TREATMENTS