skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Effects of Blending and In-Tank Pretreatment on Direct Feed Hanford High Level Waste Vitrification - 18434

Conference ·
OSTI ID:22977729
; ; ; ;  [1];  [2]
  1. Vitreous State Laboratory, The Catholic University of America, 620 Michigan Av., NE, Washington, DC 20064 (United States)
  2. Atkins Energy Federal EPC, Inc., Calverton, MD 2070 (United States)

A direct feed high level waste (DFHLW) option is under consideration for early operations of the Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP). In this option, the Pretreatment Facility would be bypassed in order to support an earlier start-up of the HLW Vitrification Facility. For HLW, this would mean that ultrafiltration and caustic leaching that would otherwise have been performed either would not be performed or would be replaced by interim pretreatment functions such as in-tank washings. These changes could result in higher aluminum contents, higher chromium contents, higher fractions of supernate, and lower solids contents in the HLW feed. As a result, glass formulations and downstream vitrification operations will be impacted. In the present work, we investigate the effects of various waste blending and in-tank pretreatment scenarios on DFHLW glass waste loadings, canister counts, and processing rates. Eleven source tanks and five waste groups were selected for the studies of waste blending. In addition, the five waste groups selected were the subjects of an in-tank pretreatment study. Glass property-composition models and melter test data were used to calculate waste loadings, canister counts, processing rates, and treatment durations for a range of DFHLW scenarios. The processing scenarios were defined by the types of waste blending and in-tank pretreatment that were assumed. Blending cases were evaluated that ranged between the 'No Blend' and 'Total Blend' extremes and included pairwise blending (blending of two source tanks, either completely or in various proportions) and macro-batches formed from various combinations of the source tanks. Over 36,000 possible pairwise blending scenarios were evaluated and an optimal retrieval/blending sequence was identified. The waste loading of this optimal sequence is within 0.03 wt% of the 'Total Blend' case. Further, a total of 38 retrieval sequences were identified that have waste loadings within 0.1 wt% of the 'Total Blend' case. To evaluate the effects of in-tank pretreatment, an in-tank wash/settle/decant process was assumed and tank-specific wash factors were employed. Washing of the macro-batch blends gave a general increase in HLW loading, decrease in canister count, and decrease in glass yield. Glass yields are towards the low end of the values expected for the WTP, which could lead to lower than nominal glass production rates. The waste loading increases and canister count reductions with washing were small for two of the wastes indicating that direct treatment of the unwashed waste may be practical. For wastes that are relatively low in sulfate and halides, excessive washing is counterproductive. The results highlight the importance of maintaining high solids content in the HLW feed to maintain glass production rates. The results also illustrate that the optimum washing strategy will need to be evaluated on a tank-to-tank basis. (authors)

Research Organization:
WM Symposia, Inc., PO Box 27646, 85285-7646 Tempe, AZ (United States)
OSTI ID:
22977729
Report Number(s):
INIS-US-20-WM-18434; TRN: US21V0357017774
Resource Relation:
Conference: WM2018: 44. Annual Waste Management Conference, Phoenix, AZ (United States), 18-22 Mar 2018; Other Information: Country of input: France; 15 refs.; Available online at: https://www.xcdsystem.com/wmsym/2018/index.html
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English