Impacts of Crust Properties on the Waste Feed Delivery of Hanford Tanks with Flammability Concerns - 18161

Conference · Sun Jul 01 04:00:00 EDT 2018

OSTI ID:22975344

Webber, Thomas ^[1]; Eaton, Bryce ^[2]

---

1. Brigham Young University (United States)
2. Washington River Protection Solutions (United States)

Mitigation of flammability concerns within Hanford waste tanks is essential to Safe Storage and Waste Feed Delivery sub-functions of the River Protection Project Mission. The tanks that have a higher propensity for the generation, retention, and release of flammable gas are considered Waste Group A tanks. Group A tanks include 241-SY-103, 241-AN-103, 241-AN-104, 241-AN-105, and 241-AW-101. Successful mitigation of flammability concerns in these tanks is necessary, as they are critical to the completion of the River Protection Project Mission as indicated in the Integrated Waste Feed Delivery Plan. The benchmark for examination of tank flammability issues is 241-SY-101. Studies of Tank 241-SY-101 gas release events showed that the mechanism of gas retention and release was highly dependent on the volume and configuration of a floating crust layer. Beginning in 1993, 241-SY-101 underwent water additions and mixer pump operations resulting in dissolution of the crust. These efforts mitigated the flammability concerns of the tank. A similar mitigation approach was recommended for Tank 241-SY103 and is recommended for the other Waste Group A tanks. However, this recommended mitigation will be more or less effective based on the expected thickness of the crust present in each of the Group A tanks. Considerations of flammable gas generation and release mechanisms were essential in the development of a successful mitigation strategy for Tank 241-SY-101, and will be essential in the development of future mitigation strategies. Because crust properties are difficult to measure, tank surface level trends and current temperature profiles are evaluated to understand crust properties. 241-AN-103 and 241-AW-101 are the only two tanks with a net increase in surface level, indicating a higher generation and retention of flammable gas. Additionally, these are the two tanks with the thickest crusts, which causes both a higher retention of gas and a reduced evaporation rate. Given the current temperature profile, crust thickness for 241-AW-101 was re-evaluated to be 145 cm (57 in) ± 30 cm (12 in) which is different from its historic value. This gives 241-AW-101 the thickest crust, second only to 241-SY-101 prior to mitigation. The crust thickness for 241-AN-103, however, retains its historic value of 89 cm (35 in) ± 16 cm (6 in). These crust properties suggest modifications to the mitigation strategy are needed for each tank. For example, 241-AN-103 and 241-AW-101 will require additional water to dissolve the crust layer before flammability concerns are mitigated and further operations could commence. Implementation of the modified mitigation strategies will mitigate flammability issues and help fulfill the Safe Storage and Waste Feed Delivery sub-functions of the River Protection Project Mission safely and efficiently. (authors)

• Research Organization: WM Symposia, Inc., PO Box 27646, 85285-7646 Tempe, AZ (United States)
• OSTI ID: 22975344
• Report Number(s): INIS-US--20-WM-18161
• Country of Publication: United States
• Language: English

Related Subjects

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE WASTES FROM NUCLEAR FACILITIES
BENCHMARKS
DISSOLUTION
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
FLAMMABILITY
HANFORD ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT LABORATORY
MITIGATION
RADIOACTIVE WASTE FACILITIES
RADIOACTIVE WASTE STORAGE
RADIOACTIVE WASTES
RIVERS
TANKS
THICKNESS