Performance of a machine learning-based decision model to help clinicians decide the extent of lymphadenectomy (D1 vs. D2) in gastric cancer before surgical resection
- TongDe Hospital of ZheJiang Province, Department of Radiology (China)
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Department of Radiology (China)
Background: Controversy still exists on the optimal surgical resection for potentially curable gastric cancer (GC). Use of radiologic evaluation and machine learning algorithms might predict extent of lymphadenectomy to limit unnecessary surgical treatment. We purposed to design a machine learning-based clinical decision-support model for predicting extent of lymphadenectomy (D1 vs. D2) in local advanced GC. Methods: Clinicoradiologic features available from routine clinical assignments in 557 patients with GCs were retrospectively interpreted by an expert panel blinded to all histopathologic information. All patients underwent surgery using standard D2 resection. Decision models were developed with a logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM) and auto-encoder (AE) algorithm in 371 training and tested in 186 test data, respectively. The primary end point was to measure diagnostic performance of decision model and a Japanese gastric cancer treatment guideline version 4th (JPN 4th) criteria for discriminate D1 (pT1 + pN0) versus D2 (≥ pT1 + ≥ pN1) lymphadenectomy. Results: The decision model with AE analysis produced highest area under ROC curve (train: 0.965, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.948–0.978; test: 0.946, 95% CI 0.925–0.978), followed by SVM (train: 0.925, 95% CI 0.902–0.944; test: 0.942, 95% CI 0.922–0.973) and LR (train: 0.886, 95% CI 0.858–0.910; test: 0.891, 95% CI 0.891–0.952). By this improvement, overtreatment was reduced from 21.7% (121/557) by treat-all pattern, to 15.1% (84/557) by JPN 4th criteria, and to 0.7–0.9% (4–5/557) by the new approach. Conclusions: The decision model with machine learning analysis demonstrates high accuracy for identifying patients who are candidates for D1 versus D2 resection. Its approximate 14–20% improvements in overtreatment compared to treat-all pattern and JPN 4th criteria potentially increase the number of patients with local advanced GCs who can safely avoid unnecessary lymphadenectomy.
- OSTI ID:
- 22925184
- Journal Information:
- Abdominal Radiology (Online), Vol. 44, Issue 9; Conference: Society of Abdominal Radiology 2019 Annual Scientific Meeting and Educational Course, Orlando, FL (United States), 17-22 Mar 2019; Other Information: Copyright (c) 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); ISSN 2366-0058
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
A nomogram for prediction of stage III/IV gastric cancer outcome after surgery: A multicenter population‐based study
SU-F-R-04: Radiomics for Survival Prediction in Glioblastoma (GBM)