skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: The NuSTAR extragalactic surveys: the number counts of active galactic nuclei and the resolved fraction of the cosmic X-ray background

Journal Article · · Astrophysical Journal
; ;  [1];  [2];  [3]; ;  [4];  [5];  [6];  [7];  [8];  [9];  [10];  [11];  [12];  [13];
  1. Cahill Center for Astronomy and Astrophysics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125 (United States)
  2. Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0HA (United Kingdom)
  3. Yale Center for Astronomy and Astrophysics, 260 Whitney Avenue, New Haven, CT 06520 (United States)
  4. Centre of Extragalactic Astronomy, Department of Physics, Durham University, Durham, DH1 3LE (United Kingdom)
  5. The Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Sheffield, Hounsfield Road, Sheffield S3 7RH (United Kingdom)
  6. Center for Relativistic Astrophysics, School of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332 (United States)
  7. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109 (United States)
  8. Department of Physics and Astronomy, Clemson University, Kinard Lab of Physics, Clemson, SC 29634-0978 (United States)
  9. Universite de Toulouse, UPS-OMP, IRAP, Toulouse (France)
  10. Instituto de Astrofísica, Facultad de Física, Pontificia Universidad Catòlica de Chile, 306, Santiago 22 (Chile)
  11. Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, The Pennsylvania State University, 525 Davey Lab, University Park, PA 16802 (United States)
  12. Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 (United States)
  13. DTU Space—National Space Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Elektrovej 327, DK-2800 Lyngby (Denmark)

We present the 3–8 keV and 8–24 keV number counts of active galactic nuclei (AGNs) identified in the Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array (NuSTAR) extragalactic surveys. NuSTAR has now resolved 33%–39% of the X-ray background in the 8–24 keV band, directly identifying AGNs with obscuring columns up to ∼10{sup 25} cm{sup −2}. In the softer 3–8 keV band the number counts are in general agreement with those measured by XMM-Newton and Chandra over the flux range 5×10{sup −15} ≲ S(3–8 keV)/erg s{sup −1} cm{sup −2} ≲ 10{sup −12} probed by NuSTAR. In the hard 8–24 keV band NuSTAR probes fluxes over the range 2×10{sup −14} ≲ S(8–24 keV)/erg s{sup −1} cm{sup −2} ≲ 10{sup −12}, a factor ∼100 fainter than previous measurements. The 8–24 keV number counts match predictions from AGN population synthesis models, directly confirming the existence of a population of obscured and/or hard X-ray sources inferred from the shape of the integrated cosmic X-ray background. The measured NuSTAR counts lie significantly above simple extrapolation with a Euclidian slope to low flux of the Swift/BAT 15–55 keV number counts measured at higher fluxes (S(15–55 keV) ≳ 10{sup −11} erg s{sup −1} cm{sup −2}), reflecting the evolution of the AGN population between the Swift/BAT local (z<0.1) sample and NuSTAR’s z∼1 sample. CXB synthesis models, which account for AGN evolution, lie above the Swift/BAT measurements, suggesting that they do not fully capture the evolution of obscured AGNs at low redshifts.

OSTI ID:
22868483
Journal Information:
Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 831, Issue 2; Other Information: Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); ISSN 0004-637X
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Cited By (22)

Constraining black hole–galaxy scaling relations and radiative efficiency from galaxy clustering journal December 2019
The XXL Survey: XXVII. The 3XLSS point source catalogue journal November 2018
The OTELO survey: I. Description, data reduction, and multi-wavelength catalogue journal October 2019
Compton-thick active galactic nuclei from the 7 Ms observation in the Chandra Deep Field South journal September 2019
The shape of the cosmic X-ray background: nuclear starburst discs and the redshift evolution of AGN obscuration journal February 2018
Broad-band X-ray analysis of local mid-infrared-selected Compton-thick AGN candidates journal May 2019
The Spectrum of the Universe journal February 2018
The NuSTAR Serendipitous Survey: The 40-month Catalog and the Properties of the Distant High-energy X-Ray Source Population journal February 2017
The NuSTAR Extragalactic Surveys: X-Ray Spectroscopic Analysis of the Bright Hard-band Selected Sample journal February 2018
Young Accreting Compact Objects in M31: The Combined Power of NuSTAR , Chandra , and Hubble journal July 2018
Black Holes and Neutron Stars in Nearby Galaxies: Insights from NuSTAR journal September 2018
The NuSTAR Extragalactic Surveys: Unveiling Rare, Buried AGNs and Detecting the Contributors to the Peak of the Cosmic X-Ray Background journal November 2018
Compton-thick AGN in the NuSTAR Era. IV. A Deep NuSTAR and XMM-Newton View of the Candidate Compton-thick AGN in ESO 116-G018 journal January 2019
The Accretion History of AGNs. I. Supermassive Black Hole Population Synthesis Model journal February 2019
BAT AGN Spectroscopic Survey. V. X-Ray Properties of the Swift /BAT 70-month AGN Catalog journal December 2017
The NuSTAR Extragalactic Surveys: Source Catalog and the Compton-thick Fraction in the UDS Field journal March 2018
X-UDS: The Chandra Legacy Survey of the UKIDSS Ultra Deep Survey Field journal June 2018
BAT AGN Spectroscopic Survey - V. X-ray properties of the Swift/BAT 70-month AGN catalog text January 2017
X-UDS: The Chandra Legacy Survey of the UKIDSS Ultra Deep Survey Field text January 2018
Compton-thick AGN in the NuSTAR era IV: A deep NuSTAR and XMM-Newton view of the candidate Compton thick AGN in ESO 116-G018 text January 2018
Compton-thick active galactic nuclei from the 7 Ms observation in the Chandra Deep Field South text January 2019
The OTELO survey. I. Description, data reduction, and multi-wavelength catalogue text January 2020