Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Remote-Handled TRU Storage Challenges at Sandia National Laboratories/ New Mexico - 16071

Conference ·
OSTI ID:22837973
 [1]; ; ; ;  [2]
  1. Weston Solutions, Inc., 3840 Commons Ave. N.E., Albuquerque, NM 87109 (United States)
  2. Sandia National Laboratories/New Mexico, P.O. Box 5800, Albuquerque, NM 87185-1151 (United States)

The events at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) in February 2014 had a significant impact on the packaging, storage, and disposal options at Sandia National Laboratories/New Mexico (Sandia) as with other transuranic generator sites. In 2012, Sandia had identified accountable material for disposal, fresh and irradiated mixed oxide (MOX) and uranium oxide (UO{sub 2}), which had been used in experiments conducted in the 1970's and 1980's. During the 2012/2013 timeframe, discussions with WIPP determined the samples and experimental vessels qualified as remote-handled (RH) transuranic (TRU) waste for disposal at WIPP. Sandia began discussions with WIPP to determine the process to repackage and characterize the material for disposal at WIPP in addition to obtain funding to complete the project. By January 2014, Sandia had contracted with Nuclear Waste Partnerships, LLC (NWP) to provide Central Characterization Program (CCP) certified visual examination (VE) and dose-to-curie (DTC) support to package and certify the accountable material/waste. Work began on February 3, 2014 with the arrival of two VE operators. On February 5, 2014, a salt truck caught fire in the underground and on February 14, 2014, the radiological release occurred at WIPP initiating a suspension of shipments. The length of the suspension was not known at the time. Sandia was only a couple of days into this long-term project, had signed a contract with NWP for support, and was still responsible for meeting earlier negotiated milestones. There were 37 parent containers which included experimental vessels from 3 to 10 feet long and unused material pieces. The original plan was to package each of the 37 parent containers separately, but several issues, including the suspension of shipments, made it imperative that a new path forward be developed. Because space is limited in the Auxiliary Hot Cell Facility (AHCF), the storage configuration for criticality safety and material-at-risk was of the highest importance. Therefore, packaging in the fewest number of containers without exceeding WIPP limits, keeping the accountable items together, and not violating any safety basis requirements was Sandia's goal. (authors)

Research Organization:
WM Symposia, Inc., PO Box 27646, 85285-7646 Tempe, AZ (United States)
OSTI ID:
22837973
Report Number(s):
INIS-US--19-WM-16071
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English