Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Field‐representative evaluation of PID‐polarization in TOPCon PV modules by accelerated stress testing

Journal Article · · Progress in Photovoltaics
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.3774· OSTI ID:2282922
 [1];  [2];  [3];  [4]
  1. National Renewable Energy Laboratory 15013 Denver West Parkway Golden Colorado 80401 USA
  2. Department of Electrical and Photonics Engineering Technical University of Denmark (DTU) Roskilde 4000 Denmark
  3. Dow Inc. 230 Abner Jackson Pkwy Lake Jackson Texas 77566 USA
  4. Trina Solar Co., Ltd No. 2 Tianhe Road, Trina PV Industrial Park, Xinbei District Changzhou Jiangsu China

Abstract

Potential‐induced degradation‐polarization (PID‐p) can reduce module power, but how to project the extent to which PID‐p may occur in field conditions considering the factors of system voltage, condensed moisture, temperature, and illumination has not been clarified. Using tunnel oxide passivated contact (TOPCon) modules, this work demonstrates a method to test full‐size crystalline silicon PV modules for PID‐p to provide field‐representative results. In initial screening tests with positive or negative 1000 V electrical bias applied at 60°C for 96 h using Al foil electrodes on the glass surfaces, the module type exhibited reversible PID‐p only on the front face when the cell circuit was in negative voltage potential. No PID was detected on the rear after testing in either polarity. We then evaluated the PID‐p sensitivity on the front side under different UV irradiances while maintaining the glass surface wet to estimate real‐world susceptibility to PID‐p. The magnitude of the observed behavior was fit using a previously developed charge transfer and depletion by light model. Whereas power loss with −1000 V applied to the cell circuit at 60°C for 96 h in the dark was about 30%, testing the module front under 0.051 W·m −2  nm −1 at 340 nm UVA irradiation using fluorescent tubes, the mean degradation was only 3%. When the modules were tested in the dark for PID‐p with in situ dark current–voltage (I‐V) characterization, the thermal activation energy for degradation was 0.71 eV; for recovery in the dark, it was 0.58 eV. Whereas recovery from the degraded state at 60°C in the dark without voltage bias was 5% absolute in 38 h, rapid recovery of about 5% absolute was observed with 1000 W·s/m 2 exposure at 25°C using a flash tester.

Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE
OSTI ID:
2282922
Alternate ID(s):
OSTI ID: 2311884
Journal Information:
Progress in Photovoltaics, Journal Name: Progress in Photovoltaics Journal Issue: 5 Vol. 32; ISSN 1062-7995
Publisher:
Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)Copyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom
Language:
English

Similar Records

Related Subjects