3-60B Type-B shipping cask enhanced operational features to facilitate leakage rate testing - 15585
- EnergySolutions, Campbell, CA, 95008 (United States)
- Leak Testing Specialists, Inc., Orlando, FL 32822 (United States)
EnergySolutions is fabricating a new 3-60B Type B Shipping Cask that will be ready for use in spring 2015, designed for shipping Type B quantities of activated and/or non-fuel-bearing reactor or accelerator components. EnergySolutions, in consult with Leak Testing Specialists, Inc., has implemented an improved design of the 3-60B cask closures to better facilitate periodic and maintenance leakage rate testing and to allow end users to more easily perform pre-shipment leakage rate testing to confirm proper assembly of the cask closures. A typical Type B cask closure lid design incorporates a double O-ring configuration, where the inner O-ring provides containment and the outer O-ring is used for leakage rate testing of the containment O-ring seal. Leakage rate testing of a double O-ring configuration is typically accomplished by filling the cask cavity with helium, pulling a vacuum on the annular space between the two O-rings and monitoring for helium leakage through the containment O-ring. One issue is the potential for helium saturation of the O-ring elastomeric material, which can result in leakage rate test failures. The cask cavity volume is typically large, and takes a significant amount of time to fill with helium. As a result, the saturation time for certain elastomeric compounds may be exceeded, leading to potential false-negative leakage rate testing results. To avoid this, that the cask cavity typically is loaded with sealed container(s) to reduce the free volume and the fill time. The improved 3-60B cask closure lid incorporates a triple O-ring seal configuration that facilitates maintenance leak rate testing of the closure lid containment O-ring seal and eliminates the issues discussed above. The triple O-ring configuration uses the middle O-ring as the containment seal, with the inner and outer test O-rings creating relatively small annular volumes for testing purposes. These small annular volumes are quick to fill, minimizing the issue of Helium saturation of the O-ring material. This seal configuration also makes it possible to detect and replace a damaged O-ring seal during loading operations, or dress a damaged sealing surface, and perform the required maintenance leakage rate testing of the replacement O-ring at the plant site without the need to unload the cask and send it to a maintenance facility. Also, a second test port has been added to each O-ring annulus to allow leakage rate testing to be accomplished using a formal system calibration that complies with the requirements and recommendations of ASME Section V, Article 10 [4], ANSI N14.5-97 [2], and ANSI N14.5-2014 [3]. This provides a simple, reliable, and accurate means to perform leakage rate testing with a test confidence level that cannot be achieved without the second test port. The improved closure and test port design simplifies and shortens the time required to perform leakage testing, resulting in reduced operating costs, greater schedule security, and dose savings for the cask users. (authors)
- Research Organization:
- WM Symposia, Inc., PO Box 27646, 85285-7646 Tempe, AZ (United States)
- OSTI ID:
- 22824447
- Report Number(s):
- INIS-US-19-WM-15585; TRN: US19V1019069493
- Resource Relation:
- Conference: WM2015: Annual Waste Management Symposium, Phoenix, AZ (United States), 15-19 Mar 2015; Other Information: Country of input: France; 4 refs.; available online at: http://archive.wmsym.org/2015/index.html
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Leakage testing of packagings with three-O-ring closure seals
Regulatory concerns for leakage testing of packagings with three O-ring closure seals
Related Subjects
12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE WASTES, AND NON-RADIOACTIVE WASTES FROM NUCLEAR FACILITIES
ACCELERATORS
ANNULAR SPACE
CASKS
CLOSURES
CONTAINMENT
HELIUM
LEAK TESTING
MAINTENANCE FACILITIES
MONITORING
RADIATION DOSES
REACTOR COMPONENTS
RECOMMENDATIONS
SCHEDULES
SEALS
SECURITY