Using Prescribed Fire to Manage the Fernald On-Site Disposal Facility Vegetated Cap - 17401
- Navarro Research and Engineering, Inc. (United States)
- US DOE (United States)
The Fernald Preserve is a former uranium processing plant that underwent extensive remediation pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). It is situated on a 425 ha (1,050 acre) tract of land, approximately 29 km (18 miles) northwest of Cincinnati, Ohio. Remedial activities and subsequent ecological restoration have converted the site from an industrial production facility to an undeveloped park, encompassing a series of wetlands, prairies, and forested communities. The remediation of buildings and soil contamination was completed in 2006, but aquifer remediation is ongoing. Since 2007, the site has been managed by the US Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management. Portions of the site are open to the public, with approximately 11 km (7 miles) of walking trails that are open year-round and a visitors center. Site remediation included the construction of an On-Site Disposal Facility (OSDF) for the long-term disposal of contaminated soil and building materials. The OSDF consists of eight disposal cells that encompass approximately 30 hectares (75 acres) on the eastern portion of the Fernald site. Cells are lined and capped, and each has a separate leak detection and leachate collection system. The integrated cap is vegetated with native grasses and forbs. Management of the Fernald Preserve includes the monitoring and maintenance of ecologically restored communities and the vegetated OSDF cap, as required by the site's institutional controls plan. Prescribed burning is recognized as the preferred method for prairie management. Prescribed fire has been used at the Fernald site since 2009 for established prairies in restored areas, but not on the OSDF cap. Stakeholders had reservations regarding the safety of using prescribed fire on the OSDF cap. Because of that, vegetation on the cap was managed as a grassland community. It was mowed, raked, and baled to remove thatch, and promote the continued establishment of native grasses and forbs. Since agricultural use is restricted at the site, the resulting hay bales were kept on property and reused as organic matter and mulch. Over time, more hay bales were being generated in a season than were reused. Therefore in 2015, DOE decided to revisit stakeholder acceptance of prescribed fire on the OSDF cap. Ongoing relationships with local stakeholders allowed for extensive discussions regarding the current management and proposed use of prescribed fire on the OSDF cap. The public was provided information about the planning and implementation of prescribed burns at the site and invited to observe the execution of a successful site burn. This approach led to stakeholder acceptance of DOE's proposal, and vegetation on the caps of cells 4, 5, and 6 was burned in late March 2016. The burn was successful and resulted in several benefits from a land stewardship and cost perspective. This paper details the stakeholder engagement approach and the resulting benefits from the use of prescribed fire on the OSDF cap. (authors)
- Research Organization:
- WM Symposia, Inc., PO Box 27646, 85285-7646 Tempe, AZ (United States)
- OSTI ID:
- 22802413
- Report Number(s):
- INIS-US--19-WM-17401
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Disturbance: a double-edged sword for restoration in a changing climate