Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Understanding Clinical Mammographic Breast Density Assessment: a Deep Learning Perspective

Journal Article · · Journal of Digital Imaging (Online)
 [1];  [2];  [1];  [3];  [1]
  1. University of Pittsburgh, Department of Radiology (United States)
  2. Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Department of Radiology (China)
  3. Magee-Womens Hospital of University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (United States)
Mammographic breast density has been established as an independent risk marker for developing breast cancer. Breast density assessment is a routine clinical need in breast cancer screening and current standard is using the Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System (BI-RADS) criteria including four qualitative categories (i.e., fatty, scattered density, heterogeneously dense, or extremely dense). In each mammogram examination, a breast is typically imaged with two different views, i.e., the mediolateral oblique (MLO) view and cranial caudal (CC) view. The BI-RADS-based breast density assessment is a qualitative process made by visual observation of both the MLO and CC views by radiologists, where there is a notable inter- and intra-reader variability. In order to maintain consistency and accuracy in BI-RADS-based breast density assessment, gaining understanding on radiologists’ reading behaviors will be educational. In this study, we proposed to leverage the newly emerged deep learning approach to investigate how the MLO and CC view images of a mammogram examination may have been clinically used by radiologists in coming up with a BI-RADS density category. We implemented a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based deep learning model, aimed at distinguishing the breast density categories using a large (15,415 images) set of real-world clinical mammogram images. Our results showed that the classification of density categories (in terms of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) using MLO view images is significantly higher than that using the CC view. This indicates that most likely it is the MLO view that the radiologists have predominately used to determine the breast density BI-RADS categories. Our study holds a potential to further interpret radiologists’ reading characteristics, enhance personalized clinical training to radiologists, and ultimately reduce reader variations in breast density assessment.
OSTI ID:
22795618
Journal Information:
Journal of Digital Imaging (Online), Journal Name: Journal of Digital Imaging (Online) Journal Issue: 4 Vol. 31; ISSN 1618-727X
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Tumor location and detectability in mammographic screening
Journal Article · Fri Oct 01 00:00:00 EDT 1982 · AJR, Am. J. Roentgenol.; (United States) · OSTI ID:6582299

Volumetric breast density evaluation from ultrasound tomography images
Journal Article · Mon Sep 15 00:00:00 EDT 2008 · Medical Physics · OSTI ID:21120908

Computerized detection of breast cancer on automated breast ultrasound imaging of women with dense breasts
Journal Article · Tue Jan 14 23:00:00 EST 2014 · Medical Physics · OSTI ID:22251263