Preliminary Concept of Operations for the Spent Fuel Management System+ - 17134

Conference · Sat Jul 01 04:00:00 EDT 2017

OSTI ID:22794537

Cumberland, Riley; Adeniyi, Abiodun; Howard, Robert; Joseph, Robert; Jarrell, Josh ^[1]; Nutt, William ^[2]

---

1. Oak Ridge National Laboratory (United States)
2. Argonne National Laboratory (United States)

The Nuclear Fuels Storage and Transportation Planning Project (NFST) within the US Department of Energy's Office of Nuclear Energy is tasked with identifying, planning, and conducting activities for developing interim storage and transportation capabilities in support of an integrated waste management system (IWMS). The IWMS is expected to transport Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) from a reactor and deliver it to a repository in a suitable container, with the possibility of interim storage. The system will be composed of multiple subsystems including possible interim storage facilities (ISFs), one or more repositories, facilities to package and/or repackage SNF, and transportation. The project team is analyzing options for an IWMS to identify viable options. To support analysis, the project team has developed a concept of operations framework for SNF related components of the potential integrated system and the interdependencies between those components. A goal of this work is to aid system analysts in developing consistent models across the project. The concept of operations framework will be updated periodically as new developments emerge. At a high level, SNF is expected to be transported from reactor sites to a repository. Initially, SNF is unloaded from reactors and placed in spent fuel pools (SFPs) for wet storage at utility sites. To maintain space in SFPs, SNF is placed in containers at reactor sites for storage and/or transportation only after the SNF has cooled enough to satisfy loading limits. Once transportation requirements are met, the SNF may be transported to an ISF, where it is stored until a repository is developed, or it is transported directly to a repository if one is available.While the high level operation of the system is straightforward, analysts must evaluate numerous alternatives, such as the number of ISFs (if any), ISF design, the stage at which SNF repackaging occurs (if needed), repackaging technology, types of containers used, repository design, component sizing, and timing of events. These alternatives arise due to technological, economic, or policy considerations. This paper provides an overview of the potential alternatives identified in the concept of operations framework at a conceptual level. (authors)

• Research Organization: WM Symposia, Inc., PO Box 27646, 85285-7646 Tempe, AZ (United States)
• OSTI ID: 22794537
• Report Number(s): INIS-US--19-WM-17134
• Country of Publication: United States
• Language: English

Related Subjects

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE WASTES FROM NUCLEAR FACILITIES
FUEL MANAGEMENT
FUEL STORAGE POOLS
RADIOACTIVE WASTE STORAGE
SPENT FUELS
STORAGE FACILITIES