Meaningful and efficient? Enduring challenges to Aboriginal participation in environmental assessment
- School of Environment and Sustainability, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan (Canada)
- Department of Geography, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan (Canada)
- Department of Political Studies, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan (Canada)
This paper explores the underlying practice-based challenges to meaningful and efficient Aboriginal participation in environmental assessment (EA) - participation that provides meaningful opportunities for Aboriginal communities to shape EA, yet assures a degree of efficiency for project proponents who need to obtain EA approvals in a timely and financially viable manner. We do so based on an analysis of the EA policy community's experience with uranium exploration and mining in Saskatchewan, Canada. Many of the challenges to meaningful and efficient Aboriginal participation that emerged are multi-dimensional, often concerning participation processes, decision-making, and relationships. Although scholars have explored many of these issues and have proposed numerous solutions, challenges persist in practice. Several other issues also emerged from our study that have received limited attention, including the non-commitment to early and ongoing participation by smaller project proponents, and the EA exemption of exploration projects; the limited availability of information to project developers on local right holders and Aboriginal interests; expectations about the integration of traditional knowledge and land use in EA not aligning with the information that is available to proponents; confusion about who is responsible for initiating early participation and consultation processes; the lack of early relationship building with potentially affected communities, particularly by governments; and the lack of other viable avenues, outside EA, for Aboriginal communities to raise more strategic issues of concern that affect traditional lands and treaty rights.
- OSTI ID:
- 22701664
- Journal Information:
- Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Vol. 65; Other Information: Copyright (c) 2016 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); ISSN 0195-9255
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Restoring public trust while tearing down site in rural Ohio
Environmental agreements, EIA follow-up and aboriginal participation in environmental management: The Canadian experience