On the origins of the linear no-threshold (LNT) dogma by means of untruths, artful dodges and blind faith
Journal Article
·
· Environmental Research
This paper is an historical assessment of how prominent radiation geneticists in the United States during the 1940s and 1950s successfully worked to build acceptance for the linear no-threshold (LNT) dose–response model in risk assessment, significantly impacting environmental, occupational and medical exposure standards and practices to the present time. Detailed documentation indicates that actions taken in support of this policy revolution were ideologically driven and deliberately and deceptively misleading; that scientific records were artfully misrepresented; and that people and organizations in positions of public trust failed to perform the duties expected of them. Key activities are described and the roles of specific individuals are documented. These actions culminated in a 1956 report by a Genetics Panel of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences (NAS) on Biological Effects of Atomic Radiation (BEAR). In this report the Genetics Panel recommended that a linear dose response model be adopted for the purpose of risk assessment, a recommendation that was rapidly and widely promulgated. The paper argues that current international cancer risk assessment policies are based on fraudulent actions of the U.S. NAS BEAR I Committee, Genetics Panel and on the uncritical, unquestioning and blind-faith acceptance by regulatory agencies and the scientific community. - Highlights: • The 1956 recommendation of the US NAS to use the LNT for risk assessment was adopted worldwide. • This recommendation is based on a falsification of the research record and represents scientific misconduct. • The record misrepresented the magnitude of panelist disagreement of genetic risk from radiation. • These actions enhanced public acceptance of their risk assessment policy recommendations.
- OSTI ID:
- 22687699
- Journal Information:
- Environmental Research, Journal Name: Environmental Research Vol. 1542; ISSN ENVRAL; ISSN 0013-9351
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
LNTgate: How scientific misconduct by the U.S. NAS led to governments adopting LNT for cancer risk assessment
The threshold vs LNT showdown: Dose rate findings exposed flaws in the LNT model part 2. How a mistake led BEIR I to adopt LNT
Lessons to be learned from a contentious challenge to mainstream radiobiological science (the linear no-threshold theory of genetic mutations)
Journal Article
·
Fri Jul 15 00:00:00 EDT 2016
· Environmental Research
·
OSTI ID:22687752
The threshold vs LNT showdown: Dose rate findings exposed flaws in the LNT model part 2. How a mistake led BEIR I to adopt LNT
Journal Article
·
Sat Apr 15 00:00:00 EDT 2017
· Environmental Research
·
OSTI ID:22689553
Lessons to be learned from a contentious challenge to mainstream radiobiological science (the linear no-threshold theory of genetic mutations)
Journal Article
·
Sat Apr 15 00:00:00 EDT 2017
· Environmental Research
·
OSTI ID:22689551