Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Prostatic Artery Embolization as an Alternative to Indwelling Bladder Catheterization to Manage Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Poor Surgical Candidates

Journal Article · · Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology
;  [1];  [2];  [1]; ;  [2];  [3];  [2]; ; ;  [1];  [4];  [2]
  1. Ospedale Niguarda Ca’ Granda, Department of Interventional Radiology (Italy)
  2. Ospedale Niguarda Ca’ Granda, Department of Urology (Italy)
  3. Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice (United States)
  4. University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Department of Interventional Radiology (Brazil)

PurposeTo prospectively assess discontinuation of indwelling bladder catheterization (IBC) and relief of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) following prostate artery embolization (PAE) in poor surgical candidates.MethodsPatients ineligible for surgical intervention were offered PAE after at least 1 month of IBC for management of urinary retention secondary to BPH; exclusion criteria for PAE included eligibility for surgery, active bladder cancer or known prostate cancer. Embolization technical and clinical success were defined as bilateral prostate embolization and removal of IBC, respectively. Patients were followed for at least 6 months and evaluated for International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life, prostate size and uroflowmetric parameters.ResultsA total of 43 patients were enrolled; bilateral embolization was performed in 33 (76.7%), unilateral embolization was performed in 8 (18.6%), and two patients could not be embolized due to tortuous and atherosclerotic pelvic vasculature (4.7%). Among the patients who were embolized, mean prostate size decreased from 75.6 ± 33.2 to 63.0 ± 23.2 g (sign rank p = 0.0001, mean reduction of 19.6 ± 17.3%), and IBC removal was achieved in 33 patients (80.5%). Clavien II complications were reported in nine patients (21.9%) and included urinary tract infection (three patients, 7.3%) and recurrent acute urinary retention (six patients, 14.6%). Nine patients (22.0%) experienced post-embolization syndrome.ConclusionsPAE is a safe and feasible for the relief of LUTS and IBC in highly comorbid patients without surgical treatment options.

OSTI ID:
22645232
Journal Information:
Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Journal Name: Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology Journal Issue: 4 Vol. 40; ISSN 0174-1551; ISSN CAIRDG
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Palliative Prostate Artery Embolization for Prostate Cancer: A Case Series
Journal Article · Tue Oct 15 00:00:00 EDT 2019 · Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology · OSTI ID:22970613

Prostatic Artery Embolization (PAE) for Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH): Part 1, Pathological Background and Clinical Implications
Journal Article · Thu Jan 14 23:00:00 EST 2016 · Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology · OSTI ID:22469634

Prostatic Tissue Elimination After Prostatic Artery Embolization (PAE): A Report of Three Cases
Journal Article · Thu Jun 15 00:00:00 EDT 2017 · Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology · OSTI ID:22645175