skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Certification systems for sustainable neighbourhoods: What do they really certify?

Journal Article · · Environmental Impact Assessment Review
 [1];  [1];  [1];  [1]
  1. Division of Environmental Strategies Analysis (fms), KTH Royal Institute of Technology, SE-100 44 Stockholm (Sweden)

Certification systems for sustainable neighbourhoods started to emerge around a decade ago. This study analysed the content, structure, weighting and indicators of two established certification systems for sustainable urban development – BREEAM Communities and LEED for Neighborhood Development. Several limitations of these systems were identified: both have a bias for procedure and feature indicators over indicators that assess actual performance; performance demands are set according to a relative understanding of sustainable development; the focus is on internal sustainability, while upstream and downstream impacts of construction are disregarded; the number and distribution of mandatory issues do not cover essential sustainability aspects; and the disproportionately large number of non-mandatory issues makes benchmarking difficult and signals that sustainability aspects are exchangeable. Altogether, this means that an area can be certified without being sustainable. Moreover, the lack of continuous development of certification requirements in the systems means that they risk exerting a conservative effect on urban development, rather than pushing it forward. - Highlights: • BREEAM-C and LEED-ND were analysed in terms of content and structure. • Specific attention was given to the type of indicators used for showing compliance. • In both systems procedure and feature indicators dominate over performance indicators. • Several other limitations of these certification systems were also identified. • Altogether the limitations imply that a certificate does not warrant sustainability.

OSTI ID:
22589226
Journal Information:
Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Vol. 56; Other Information: Copyright (c) 2015 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); ISSN 0195-9255
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

A critical review of environmental assessment tools for sustainable urban design
Journal Article · Sun Nov 15 00:00:00 EST 2015 · Environmental Impact Assessment Review · OSTI ID:22589226

Sustainable transportation according to certification systems: A viability analysis based on neighborhood size and context relevance
Journal Article · Wed Mar 15 00:00:00 EDT 2017 · Environmental Impact Assessment Review · OSTI ID:22589226

Towards sustainable urban communities
Journal Article · Sun Jan 15 00:00:00 EST 2012 · Environmental Impact Assessment Review · OSTI ID:22589226