Effect of intrafractional prostate motion on simultaneous boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy to the prostate: A simulation study based on intrafractional motion in the prone position
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University Kyoto (Japan)
- Division of Clinical Radiology Service, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto (Japan)
Although the prostate displacement of patients in the prone position is affected by respiration-induced motion, the effect of intrafractional prostate motion in the prone position during “simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy” (SIB-IMRT) is unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dosimetric effects of intrafractional motion on SIB-IMRT to a dominant intraprostatic lesion (IPL) using measured motion data of patients in a prone position, fixed with a thermoplastic shell. We obtained 2 orthogonal x-ray fluoroscopic images at the same moment every 0.2 seconds for 30 seconds before and after treatment, once weekly, from 7 patients with localized prostate cancer with detectable prostatic calcification. Prostate displacements in the left-right (LR), anteroposterior (AP), and superoinferior (SI) directions were calculated using the prostatic calcification as a fiducial marker. We defined the displacement between pretreatment and posttreatment as baseline drift (BD). An SIB-IMRT plan was generated in which each IPL + 3 mm received a dose of 94.5 Gy, whereas the remainder of the prostate + 7 mm received a dose of 75.6 Gy in 9 fields. A simulated plan of dose blurring was generated by the convolution of isocenter-shifted plans using measured motion data in 30 seconds and motion in 30 seconds + distance between pretreatment and posttreatment position (BD) for each of the 7 patients. The motion in 30 seconds mainly reflected respiration-induced motion. The mean displacements of BD were 1.4 mm (− 3.1 to 8.2 mm), − 2.2 mm (− 9.1 to 1.5 mm), and − 0.3 mm (− 5.0 to 1.8 mm) in the AP, SI, and LR directions, respectively. The differences in the target coverage with V{sub 90%} of the IPL and V{sub 100%} of the prostate between the simulated plan and original plan were − 3.9% to − 0.3% and − 0.6% to 1.1% for respiration-induced motion and 3.1% to − 67.8% and 3.6% to − 13.3% for BD with respiration-induced motion, respectively. The large motion of BD resulted in an inadequate coverage by the prescribed dose of the SIB-IMRT to the IPL. A 7-mm margin is recommended when real-time tracking techniques are not applied. The effect of respiration-induced motion was small, so long as a 3-mm margin was added.
- OSTI ID:
- 22577844
- Journal Information:
- Medical Dosimetry, Journal Name: Medical Dosimetry Journal Issue: 4 Vol. 40; ISSN 0958-3947
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Inferences About Prostate Intrafraction Motion From Pre- and Posttreatment Volumetric Imaging
Influence of Antiflatulent Dietary Advice on Intrafraction Motion for Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy