Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

SU-E-T-584: Optical Tracking Guided Patient-Specific VMAT QA with ArcCHECK

Journal Article · · Medical Physics
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4924946· OSTI ID:22496297
; ; ; ; ; ; ;  [1]
  1. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL (United States)

Purpose: To investigate the novel use of an in-house optical tracking system (OTS) to improve the efficacy of VMAT QA with a cylindrical dosimeter (ArcCHECK™). Methods: The translational and rotational setup errors of ArcCHECK are convoluted which makes it challenging to position the device efficiently and accurately. We first aligned the ArcCHECK to the machine cross-hair at three cardinal angles (0°, 90°, and 270°) to establish a reference position. Four infrared reflective markers were attached to the back of the device. An OTS with 0.2mm/0.2° accuracy was used to control its setup uncertainty. Translational uncertainties of 1 mm and 2 mm in three directions (in, right, and up) were applied on the device. Four open beams of various field sizes and six clinical VMAT arcs were delivered and measured for all simulated setup errors. The measurements were compared with Pinnacle™ calculations using Gamma analysis to evaluate the impact of setup uncertainty. This study also evaluated the improvement in setup reproducibility and efficiency with the aid of the OTS. Results: For open beams, with 3%/3mm, the mean passing rates dropped by less than 5% for all shifts; with 2%/2mm, two significant drops(>5%) were observed: 15.38±6.75% for 2 mm lateral shift and 9.35±4.88% for 2 mm longitudinal shift. For VMAT arcs, the mean passing rates using 2%/2mm dropped by 10.47±7.46% and 22.02±11.39% for 1 and 2 mm shift, respectively. With 3%/3mm, significant drop only occurred with 2 mm longitudinal shift (13.73±8.30%). Setup time could be reduced by >15 min with the aid of the OTS. Conclusion: OTS is an effective tool for separating translational and rotational uncertainties. The current VMAT QA solution was not strongly sensitive to translation errors of 2mm with widely accepted criterion (3%/3mm). This finding raises concerns regarding the efficacy of such QA system in detecting errors in the dynamic VMAT delivery.

OSTI ID:
22496297
Journal Information:
Medical Physics, Journal Name: Medical Physics Journal Issue: 6 Vol. 42; ISSN 0094-2405; ISSN MPHYA6
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

SU-E-T-631: Commissioning and Comprehensive Evaluation of the ArcCHECK Cylindrical Diode Array for VMAT QA
Journal Article · Sun Jun 15 00:00:00 EDT 2014 · Medical Physics · OSTI ID:22402236

SU-F-T-558: ArcCheck for Patient Specific QA in Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy
Journal Article · Wed Jun 15 00:00:00 EDT 2016 · Medical Physics · OSTI ID:22649133

SU-E-T-64: A Programmable Moving Insert for the ArcCHECK Phantom for Dose Verification of Respiratory-Gated VMAT
Journal Article · Mon Jun 15 00:00:00 EDT 2015 · Medical Physics · OSTI ID:22545194