Pneumothorax Complicating Coaxial and Non-coaxial CT-Guided Lung Biopsy: Comparative Analysis of Determining Risk Factors and Management of Pneumothorax in a Retrospective Review of 650 Patients
Abstract
PurposeTo assess the scope and determining risk factors related to the development of pneumothorax throughout CT-guided biopsy of pulmonary lesions in coaxial and non-coaxial techniques and the outcome of its management.Materials and MethodsThe study included CT-guided percutaneous lung biopsies in 650 consecutive patients (407 males, 243 females; mean age 54.6 years, SD 5.2) from November 2008 to June 2013 in a retrospective design. Patients were classified according to lung biopsy technique into coaxial group (318 lesions) and non-coaxial group (332 lesions). Exclusion criteria for biopsy were lesions <5 mm in diameter, uncorrectable coagulopathy, positive-pressure ventilation, severe respiratory compromise, pulmonary arterial hypertension, or refusal of the procedure. Risk factors related to the occurrence of pneumothorax were classified into: (a) Technical risk factors, (b) patient-related risk factors, and (c) lesion-associated risk factors. Radiological assessments were performed by two radiologists in consensus. Mann–Whitney U test and Fisher’s exact tests were used for statistical analysis. p values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.ResultsThe incidence of pneumothorax complicating CT-guided lung biopsy was less in the non-coaxial group (23.2 %, 77 out of 332) than the coaxial group (27 %, 86 out of 318). However, the difference in incidence between both groups was statistically insignificant (p = 0.14). Significant risk factors for themore »
- Authors:
- Johan Wolfgang Goethe – University Hospital, Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (Germany)
- Publication Date:
- OSTI Identifier:
- 22469604
- Resource Type:
- Journal Article
- Resource Relation:
- Journal Name: Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology; Journal Volume: 39; Journal Issue: 2; Conference: BSIR 2015: Britisch Society of Interventional Radiology 2015 annual meeting, Glasgow, Scotland (United Kingdom), 4-6 Nov 2015; Other Information: Copyright (c) 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE); http://www.springer-ny.com; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
- Subject:
- 62 RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE; ANIMAL TISSUES; BIOPSY; CHEST; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DEPTH; DESIGN; EMPHYSEMA; FAILURES; FEMALES; HAZARDS; HEMORRHAGE; HYPERTENSION; LEAKS; LUNGS; MALES; MATERIALS; PATIENTS; SURFACES; TUBES; VENTILATION; YIELDS
Citation Formats
Nour-Eldin, Nour-Eldin A., E-mail: nour410@hotmail.com, Alsubhi, Mohammed, E-mail: mohammedal-subhi@yahoo.com, Emam, Ahmed, E-mail: morgan101002@hotmail.com, Lehnert, Thomas, E-mail: thomas.lehnert@kgu.de, Beeres, Martin, E-mail: beeres@gmx.net, Jacobi, Volkmar, E-mail: volkmar.jacobi@kgu.de, Gruber-Rouh, Tatjana, E-mail: tatjanagruber2004@yahoo.com, Scholtz, Jan-Erik, E-mail: janerikscholtz@gmail.com, Vogl, Thomas J., E-mail: t.vogl@em.uni-frankfurt.de, and Naguib, Nagy N., E-mail: nagynnn@yahoo.com. Pneumothorax Complicating Coaxial and Non-coaxial CT-Guided Lung Biopsy: Comparative Analysis of Determining Risk Factors and Management of Pneumothorax in a Retrospective Review of 650 Patients. United States: N. p., 2016.
Web. doi:10.1007/S00270-015-1167-3.
Nour-Eldin, Nour-Eldin A., E-mail: nour410@hotmail.com, Alsubhi, Mohammed, E-mail: mohammedal-subhi@yahoo.com, Emam, Ahmed, E-mail: morgan101002@hotmail.com, Lehnert, Thomas, E-mail: thomas.lehnert@kgu.de, Beeres, Martin, E-mail: beeres@gmx.net, Jacobi, Volkmar, E-mail: volkmar.jacobi@kgu.de, Gruber-Rouh, Tatjana, E-mail: tatjanagruber2004@yahoo.com, Scholtz, Jan-Erik, E-mail: janerikscholtz@gmail.com, Vogl, Thomas J., E-mail: t.vogl@em.uni-frankfurt.de, & Naguib, Nagy N., E-mail: nagynnn@yahoo.com. Pneumothorax Complicating Coaxial and Non-coaxial CT-Guided Lung Biopsy: Comparative Analysis of Determining Risk Factors and Management of Pneumothorax in a Retrospective Review of 650 Patients. United States. doi:10.1007/S00270-015-1167-3.
Nour-Eldin, Nour-Eldin A., E-mail: nour410@hotmail.com, Alsubhi, Mohammed, E-mail: mohammedal-subhi@yahoo.com, Emam, Ahmed, E-mail: morgan101002@hotmail.com, Lehnert, Thomas, E-mail: thomas.lehnert@kgu.de, Beeres, Martin, E-mail: beeres@gmx.net, Jacobi, Volkmar, E-mail: volkmar.jacobi@kgu.de, Gruber-Rouh, Tatjana, E-mail: tatjanagruber2004@yahoo.com, Scholtz, Jan-Erik, E-mail: janerikscholtz@gmail.com, Vogl, Thomas J., E-mail: t.vogl@em.uni-frankfurt.de, and Naguib, Nagy N., E-mail: nagynnn@yahoo.com. Mon .
"Pneumothorax Complicating Coaxial and Non-coaxial CT-Guided Lung Biopsy: Comparative Analysis of Determining Risk Factors and Management of Pneumothorax in a Retrospective Review of 650 Patients". United States.
doi:10.1007/S00270-015-1167-3.
@article{osti_22469604,
title = {Pneumothorax Complicating Coaxial and Non-coaxial CT-Guided Lung Biopsy: Comparative Analysis of Determining Risk Factors and Management of Pneumothorax in a Retrospective Review of 650 Patients},
author = {Nour-Eldin, Nour-Eldin A., E-mail: nour410@hotmail.com and Alsubhi, Mohammed, E-mail: mohammedal-subhi@yahoo.com and Emam, Ahmed, E-mail: morgan101002@hotmail.com and Lehnert, Thomas, E-mail: thomas.lehnert@kgu.de and Beeres, Martin, E-mail: beeres@gmx.net and Jacobi, Volkmar, E-mail: volkmar.jacobi@kgu.de and Gruber-Rouh, Tatjana, E-mail: tatjanagruber2004@yahoo.com and Scholtz, Jan-Erik, E-mail: janerikscholtz@gmail.com and Vogl, Thomas J., E-mail: t.vogl@em.uni-frankfurt.de and Naguib, Nagy N., E-mail: nagynnn@yahoo.com},
abstractNote = {PurposeTo assess the scope and determining risk factors related to the development of pneumothorax throughout CT-guided biopsy of pulmonary lesions in coaxial and non-coaxial techniques and the outcome of its management.Materials and MethodsThe study included CT-guided percutaneous lung biopsies in 650 consecutive patients (407 males, 243 females; mean age 54.6 years, SD 5.2) from November 2008 to June 2013 in a retrospective design. Patients were classified according to lung biopsy technique into coaxial group (318 lesions) and non-coaxial group (332 lesions). Exclusion criteria for biopsy were lesions <5 mm in diameter, uncorrectable coagulopathy, positive-pressure ventilation, severe respiratory compromise, pulmonary arterial hypertension, or refusal of the procedure. Risk factors related to the occurrence of pneumothorax were classified into: (a) Technical risk factors, (b) patient-related risk factors, and (c) lesion-associated risk factors. Radiological assessments were performed by two radiologists in consensus. Mann–Whitney U test and Fisher’s exact tests were used for statistical analysis. p values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.ResultsThe incidence of pneumothorax complicating CT-guided lung biopsy was less in the non-coaxial group (23.2 %, 77 out of 332) than the coaxial group (27 %, 86 out of 318). However, the difference in incidence between both groups was statistically insignificant (p = 0.14). Significant risk factors for the development of pneumothorax in both groups were emphysema (p < 0.001 in both groups), traversing a fissure with the biopsy needle (p value 0.005 in non-coaxial group and 0.001 in coaxial group), small lesion, less than 2 cm in diameter (p value of 0.02 in both groups), location of the lesion in the basal or mid sections of the lung (p = 0.003 and <0.001 in non-coaxial and coaxial groups, respectively), and increased needle track path within the lung tissue of more than 2.5 cm (p = 0.01 in both groups). The incidence of pneumothorax in the non-coaxial group was significantly correlated to the number of specimens obtained (p = 0.006). This factor was statistically insignificant in the coaxial group (p = 0.45). The biopsy yield was more diagnostic and conclusive in the coaxial group in comparison to the non-coaxial group (p = 0.008). Simultaneous incidence of pneumothorax and pulmonary hemorrhage was 27.3 % (21/77) in non-coaxial group and in 30.2 % (26/86) in coaxial group. Conservative management was sufficient for treatment of 91 out of 101 patients of pneumothorax in both groups (90.1 %). Manual evacuation of pneumothorax was efficient in 44/51 patients (86.3 %) in both groups and intercostal chest tube was applied after failure of manual evacuation (7 patients: 13.7 %), from which one patient developed a persistent air leakage necessitating pleurodesis.ConclusionPneumothorax complicating CT-guided core biopsy of pulmonary lesions, showed the insignificant difference between coaxial and non-coaxial techniques. However, both techniques have the same significant risk factors including small and basal lesions, increased lesion’s depth from pleural surface, and increased length of aerated lung parenchyma crossed by biopsy needle and passing through pulmonary fissures in the needle tract.},
doi = {10.1007/S00270-015-1167-3},
journal = {Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology},
number = 2,
volume = 39,
place = {United States},
year = {Mon Feb 15 00:00:00 EST 2016},
month = {Mon Feb 15 00:00:00 EST 2016}
}
-
Our goal was to assess the usefulness of spirometry to estimate the risk of pneumothorax in patients undergoing percutaneous needle biopsy with CT guidance for solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN). We studied the results of 51 consecutive percutaneous needle biopsies with CT guidance for SPN obtained between 1988 and 1990. Forty-five men and six women, aged 65 {+-} 11 (36-86) years, were included in the study. All biopsies were performed under CT guidance, with 90 mm 25G needles (0.5 mm thickness) fitted into luer-type syringes. The number of needle pass attempts never exceeded three. A spirometry before biopsy was performed inmore »
-
Percutaneous CT-Guided Biopsy of the Lung: Comparison Between Aspiration and Automated Cutting Needles Using a Coaxial Technique
Purpose: To compare the accuracy and complication rate of two different CT-guided transthoracic needle biopsy techniques: fine needle aspiration and an automated biopsy device.Methods: Two consecutive series of respectively 125 (group A) and 98 (group B) biopsies performed using 20-22 gauge coaxial fine needle aspiration (group A) and an automated 19.5 gauge coaxial biopsy device (group B) were compared in terms of their accuracy and complication rate.Results: Groups A and B included respectively 100 (80%) and 77 (79%) malignant lesions and 25 (20%) and 18 (21%) benign lesions. No significant difference was found between the two series concerning patients, lesions,more » -
CT Fluoroscopy-Guided Lung Biopsy with Novel Steerable Biopsy Canula: Ex-Vivo Evaluation in Ventilated Porcine Lung Explants
The purpose was to evaluate ex-vivo a prototype of a novel biopsy canula under CT fluoroscopy-guidance in ventilated porcine lung explants in respiratory motion simulations. Using an established chest phantom for porcine lung explants, n = 24 artificial lesions consisting of a fat-wax-Lipiodol mixture (approx. 70HU) were placed adjacent to sensible structures such as aorta, pericardium, diaphragm, bronchus and pulmonary artery. A piston pump connected to a reservoir beneath a flexible silicone reconstruction of a diaphragm simulated respiratory motion by rhythmic inflation and deflation of 1.5 L water. As biopsy device an 18-gauge prototype biopsy canula with a lancet-like, helicallymore » -
Efficacy of a Self-expanding Tract Sealant Device in the Reduction of Pneumothorax and Chest Tube Placement Rates After Percutaneous Lung Biopsy: A Matched Controlled Study Using Propensity Score Analysis
PurposeTo evaluate the use of a self-expanding tract sealant device (BioSentry™) on the rates of pneumothorax and chest tube insertion after percutaneous lung biopsy.Materials and MethodsIn this retrospective study, we compared 318 patients who received BioSentry™ during percutaneous lung biopsy (treated group) with 1956 patients who did not (control group). Patient-, lesion-, and procedure-specific variables, and pneumothorax and chest tube insertion rates were recorded. To adjust for potential selection bias, patients in the treated group were matched 1:1 to patients in the control group using propensity score matching based on the above-mentioned variables. Patients were considered a match if themore » -
Impact of Weight Change During the Course of Concurrent Chemoradiation Therapy on Outcomes in Stage IIIB Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: Retrospective Analysis of 425 Patients
Purpose: We retrospectively investigated the impact of weight change (WC) during concurrent chemoradiation therapy (C-CRT) on clinical outcomes of stage 3B non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Methods and Materials: A total of 425 patients treated with C-CRT were included. All patients received 60 to 66 Gy of thoracic radiation therapy concurrently with 1 to 3 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy. Pre- and posttreatment weight measurements on first and last days of C-CRT were used for WC. Patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 = weight loss (WL); group 2 = weight preservation/gain (WP) for comparative analyses. Results: Following C-CRT,more »