skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: WE-G-18C-06: Is Diaphragm Motion a Good Surrogate for Liver Tumor Motion?

Journal Article · · Medical Physics
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4889525· OSTI ID:22409777
 [1]; ; ; ; ;  [1];  [2];  [3]
  1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (United States)
  2. School of Information Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong (China)
  3. Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (United States)

Purpose: To investigate whether diaphragm motion is a good surrogate for liver tumor motion by comparing their motion trajectories obtained from cine-MRI. Methods: Fourteen patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (10/14) or liver metastases (4/14) undergoing radiation therapy were included in this study. All patients underwent single-slice 2D cine-MRI simulations across the center of the tumor in three orthogonal planes. Tumor and diaphragm motion trajectories in the superior-inferior (SI), anteriorposterior (AP), and medial-lateral (ML) directions were obtained using the normalized cross-correlation based tracking technique. Agreement between tumor and diaphragm motions was assessed by calculating the phase difference percentage (PDP), intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland-Altman analysis (Diffs) and paired t-test. The distance (D) between tumor and tracked diaphragm area was analyzed to understand its impact on the correlation between tumor and diaphragm motions. Results: Of all patients, the means (±standard deviations) of PDP were 7.1 (±1.1)%, 4.5 (±0.5)% and 17.5 (±4.5)% in the SI, AP and ML directions, respectively. The means of ICC were 0.98 (±0.02), 0.97 (±0.02), and 0.08 (±0.06) in the SI, AP and ML directions, respectively. The Diffs were 2.8 (±1.4) mm, 2.4 (±1.1) mm, and 2.2 (±0.5) mm in the SI, AP and ML directions, respectively. The p-values derived from the paired t-test were < 0.02 in SI and AP directions, whereas were > 0.58 in ML direction primarily due to the small motion in ML direction. Tumor and diaphragmatic motion had high concordance when the distance between the tumor and tracked diaphragm areas was small. Conclusion: Preliminary results showed that liver tumor motion had good correlations with diaphragm motion in the SI and AP directions, indicating diaphragm motion in the SI and AP directions could potentially be a reliable surrogate for liver tumor motion. NIH (1R21CA165384-01A1), Golfers Against Cancer (GAC) Foundation, The China Scholarship Council (CSC)

OSTI ID:
22409777
Journal Information:
Medical Physics, Vol. 41, Issue 6; Other Information: (c) 2014 American Association of Physicists in Medicine; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); ISSN 0094-2405
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Is Diaphragm Motion a Good Surrogate for Liver Tumor Motion?
Journal Article · Sat Nov 15 00:00:00 EST 2014 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:22409777

Four-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Axial Body Area as Respiratory Surrogate: Initial Patient Results
Journal Article · Sat Mar 15 00:00:00 EDT 2014 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:22409777

SU-E-J-235: Audiovisual Biofeedback Improves the Correlation Between Internal and External Respiratory Motion
Journal Article · Mon Jun 15 00:00:00 EDT 2015 · Medical Physics · OSTI ID:22409777