Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

SU-E-T-521: Feasibility Study of a Rotational Step-And-Shoot IMRT Treatment Planning Approach

Journal Article · · Medical Physics
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4888854· OSTI ID:22369648
 [1];  [2];  [3]; ;  [4]; ;  [5]; ;  [6]
  1. Univ. of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC (United States)
  2. UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC (United States)
  3. UNC Hospitals, Chapel Hill, NC (United States)
  4. Duke University, Durham, NC (United States)
  5. UniversityNorth Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (United States)
  6. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (United States)

Purpose: Rotational step-and-shot IMRT (r-IMRT) could improve delivery efficiency with good dose conformity, especially if it can leverage the burst mode of the accelerator where radiation is turned on/off momentarily while the gantry rotates continuously. The challenge for the r-IMRT planning is to minimize the number of beams to achieve a fast and smooth rotational delivery. Methods: Treatment plans for r-IMRT were created using an in-house treatment planning system. To generate the plan using a very few beams, gantry angle was optimized by weighting the beam monitoring unit (MU), and beam shape optimization was a combination of column search with k-means clustering. A prostate case and a head and neck case were planned using r-IMRT. The dosimetry is compared to s-IMRT planned with Varian Eclipse treatment planning system. Results: With the same PTV dose coverage D95=100%, the r-IMRT plans shows comparable sparing as the s-IMRT plans in the prostate for the rectum D10cc and the bladder Dmean, and in the head and neck for the spinal cord Dmax, the brain stem Dmax, the left/right parotid Dmean, the larynx Dmean, and the mandible Dmean. Both plans meet the established institutional clinical dosimetric criteria. The r-IMRT plan uses 19 beam/405 MU for the prostate, and 68 beam/880 MU for the head and neck, while the s-IMRT uses 7 beam/724 MU and 9 beam/1812 MU, respectively. Compared to the corresponding s-IMRT, r-IMRT has a reduction of MUs of 44% for the prostate case and 41% for the head and neck case. Conclusions: We have demonstrated the feasibility of a rotational step and shoot IMRT treatment planning approach that significantly shortens the conventional IMRT treatment beam-on time without degrading the dose comformity.

OSTI ID:
22369648
Journal Information:
Medical Physics, Journal Name: Medical Physics Journal Issue: 6 Vol. 41; ISSN 0094-2405; ISSN MPHYA6
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Feasibility of a unified approach to intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volume-modulated arc therapy optimization and delivery
Journal Article · Sat Feb 14 23:00:00 EST 2015 · Medical Physics · OSTI ID:22413438

Sci—Fri AM: Mountain — 05: Unified Optimization and Delivery of Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy and Volume-modulated Arc Therapy
Journal Article · Fri Aug 15 00:00:00 EDT 2014 · Medical Physics · OSTI ID:22407702

Many-isocenter optimization for robotic radiotherapy
Journal Article · Sun Feb 09 23:00:00 EST 2020 · Physics in Medicine and Biology (Online) · OSTI ID:1803104