Stochastic Look-Ahead Commitment: A Case Study in MISO

Knueven, Bernard; Faqiry, M. Nazif; Garcia, Manuel; Chen, Yonghong; Treinen, Roger; Werho, Trevor; Zhang, Junshan; Vittal, Vijay; Zhao, Long; Thatte, Anupam; Yin, Shengfei

doi:10.1109/PESGM52003.2023.10253199

Stochastic Look-Ahead Commitment: A Case Study in MISO

Conference · 25 September 2023

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/PESGM52003.2023.10253199· OSTI ID:2229085

Knueven, Bernard; Faqiry, M. Nazif; Garcia, Manuel; Chen, Yonghong; Treinen, Roger; Werho, Trevor; Zhang, Junshan; Vittal, Vijay; Zhao, Long; Thatte, Anupam; Yin, Shengfei

This paper introduces the Stochastic Look Ahead Commitment (SLAC) software prototyped and tested for the Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO) look ahead commitment process. SLAC can incorporate hundreds of wind, load, and net scheduled interchange (NSI) uncertainty scenarios. It uses a progressive hedging method to solve a novel two-stage stochastic unit commitment. The first stage commitment decisions, made only for those generators whose decision to commit or not in each time period cannot be deferred, can cover the uncertainties within the next three hours. The second stage includes both the dispatch for each of the scenarios and the commitment decisions that can be deferred. Study results on 15 MISO production days show that SLAC may bring economic and reliability benefits under uncertainty.

🛈

OSTI does not have a digital full text copy available. For more information, please see document availability, search WorldCat, or search Google Scholar.

Research Organization:: National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)

Sponsoring Organization:: USDOE Advanced Research Projects Agency - Energy (ARPA-E)

DOE Contract Number:: AC36-08GO28308

OSTI ID:: 2229085

Report Number(s):: NREL/CP-2C00-88230; MainId:89005; UUID:f8ccfc88-40cd-44d3-bfce-8b1cc0772886; MainAdminID:71241

Resource Relation:: Conference: Presented at the the 2023 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM), 16-20 July 2023, Orlando, Florida; Related Information: 84539

Country of Publication:: United States

Language:: English

References (18)

Pyomo: modeling and solving mathematical programs in Python Hart, William E.; Watson, Jean-Paul; Woodruff, David L. Mathematical Programming Computation, Vol. 3, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12532-011-0026-8	journal	August 2011
Pyomo — Optimization Modeling in Python Bynum, Michael L.; Hackebeil, Gabriel A.; Hart, William E. Springer Optimization and Its Applications https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68928-5	book	January 2021
Combining Progressive Hedging with a Frank--Wolfe Method to Compute Lagrangian Dual Bounds in Stochastic Mixed-Integer Programming Boland, Natashia; Christiansen, Jeffrey; Dandurand, Brian SIAM Journal on Optimization, Vol. 28, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1137/16M1076290	journal	January 2018
On Mixed-Integer Programming Formulations for the Unit Commitment Problem Knueven, Bernard; Ostrowski, James; Watson, Jean-Paul INFORMS Journal on Computing https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2019.0944	journal	June 2020
Stochastic Unit Commitment Performance Considering Monte Carlo Wind Power Scenarios Rachunok, Benjamin; Staid, Andrea; Watson, Jean-Paul 2018 IEEE International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems (PMAPS) https://doi.org/10.1109/PMAPS.2018.8440563	conference	June 2018
Real-Time Markets for Flexiramp: A Stochastic Unit Commitment-Based Analysis Wang, Beibei; Hobbs, Benjamin F. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 31, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2015.2411268	journal	March 2016
Obtaining lower bounds from the progressive hedging algorithm for stochastic mixed-integer programs Gade, Dinakar; Hackebeil, Gabriel; Ryan, Sarah M. Mathematical Programming, Vol. 157, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-016-1000-z	journal	April 2016
Incorporating Post Zonal Reserve Deployment Transmission Constraints Into Energy and Ancillary Service Co-Optimization Chen, Yonghong; Gribik, Paul; Gardner, Joe IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 29, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2013.2284791	journal	March 2014
Toward scalable stochastic unit commitment: Part 2: solver configuration and performance assessment Cheung, Kwok; Gade, Dinakar; Silva-Monroy, César Energy Systems, Vol. 6, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12667-015-0148-6	journal	April 2015
Applying robust optimization to MISO Look-Ahead commitment Chen, Yonghong; Wang, Qianfan; Wang, Xing 2014 IEEE PES General Meeting \| Conference & Exposition https://doi.org/10.1109/PESGM.2014.6939258	conference	July 2014
Resource transition model under MISO MIP based Look Ahead Commitment No authors listed 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting https://doi.org/10.1109/PESGM.2012.6344724	conference	July 2012
A stochastic model for the unit commitment problem Takriti, S.; Birge, J. R.; Long, E. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 11, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1109/59.535691	journal	January 1996
Scenarios and Policy Aggregation in Optimization Under Uncertainty Rockafellar, R. T.; Wets, Roger J. -B. Mathematics of Operations Research, Vol. 16, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.16.1.119	journal	February 1991
Stochastic unit commitment via Progressive Hedging — extensive analysis of solution methods Ordoudis, Christos; Pinson, Pierre; Zugno, Marco 2015 IEEE Eindhoven PowerTech https://doi.org/10.1109/PTC.2015.7232629	conference	June 2015
Toward scalable, parallel progressive hedging for stochastic unit commitment Ryan, Sarah M.; Wets, Roger J. -B; Woodruff, David L. 2013 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting https://doi.org/10.1109/PESMG.2013.6673013	conference	January 2013
Fundamentals and recent developments in stochastic unit commitment Håberg, Martin International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, Vol. 109 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2019.01.037	journal	July 2019
Stochastic Optimization for Unit Commitment—A Review Zheng, Qipeng P.; Wang, Jianhui; Liu, Andrew L. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 30, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2014.2355204	journal	July 2015
Large-Scale Stochastic Mixed-Integer Programming Algorithms for Power Generation Scheduling Kim, Kibaek; Zavala, Victor M. Alternative Energy Sources and Technologies https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28752-2_18	book	January 2016

Similar Records

Stochastic Look-Ahead Commitment: A Case Study in MISO: Preprint

Conference · 2023 · OSTI ID:2001483

Knueven, Bernard; Faqiry, M. Nazif; Garcia, Manuel; +8 more

Operation of a High Renewable Penetrated Power System With CSP Plants: A Look-Ahead Stochastic Unit Commitment Model

Journal Article · 2019 · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · OSTI ID:1492511

Du, Ershun; Zhang, Ning; Hodge, Bri-Mathias; +5 more

STOCHASTIC OPTIMAL POWER FLOW FOR REAL-TIME MANAGEMENT OF DISTRIBUTED RENEWABLE GENERATION AND DEMAND RESPONSE (Final Report)

Technical Report · 2021 · OSTI ID:1990021

Zhang, Junshan

Related Subjects

MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING
stochastic optimization
uncertainty management
unit commitment

Stochastic Look-Ahead Commitment: A Case Study in MISO

Citation Formats

References (18)

Similar Records

Related Subjects