skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) 2012 Workforce Study: The Radiation Oncologists' and Residents' Perspectives

Journal Article · · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
 [1];  [2];  [3];  [4];  [5];  [6];  [7]
  1. Indiana University Health East, Indianapolis, Indiana (United States)
  2. Commonwealth Newburyport Cancer Center, Newburyport, Massachusetts (United States)
  3. William R. Bliss Cancer Center, Ames, Iowa (United States)
  4. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (United States)
  5. VA Veteran Hospital/University of California Irvine, Newport Beach, California (United States)
  6. ASTRO, Fairfax, Virginia (United States)
  7. Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (United States)

Purpose: The American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) conducted the 2012 Radiation Oncology Workforce Survey to obtain an up-to-date picture of the workforce, assess its needs and concerns, and identify quality and safety improvement opportunities. The results pertaining to radiation oncologists (ROs) and residents (RORs) are presented here. Methods: The ASTRO Workforce Subcommittee, in collaboration with allied radiation oncology professional societies, conducted a survey study in early 2012. An online survey questionnaire was sent to all segments of the radiation oncology workforce. Respondents who were actively working were included in the analysis. This manuscript describes the data for ROs and RORs. Results: A total of 3618 ROs and 568 RORs were surveyed. The response rate for both groups was 29%, with 1047 RO and 165 ROR responses. Among ROs, the 2 most common racial groups were white (80%) and Asian (15%), and the male-to-female ratio was 2.85 (74% male). The median age of ROs was 51. ROs averaged 253.4 new patient consults in a year and 22.9 on-treatment patients. More than 86% of ROs reported being satisfied or very satisfied overall with their career. Close to half of ROs reported having burnout feelings. There was a trend toward more frequent burnout feelings with increasing numbers of new patient consults. ROs' top concerns were related to documentation, reimbursement, and patients' health insurance coverage. Ninety-five percent of ROs felt confident when implementing new technology. Fifty-one percent of ROs thought that the supply of ROs was balanced with demand, and 33% perceived an oversupply. Conclusions: This study provides a current snapshot of the 2012 radiation oncology physician workforce. There was a predominance of whites and men. Job satisfaction level was high. However a substantial fraction of ROs reported burnout feelings. Perceptions about supply and demand balance were mixed. ROs top concerns reflect areas of attention for the healthcare sector as a whole.

OSTI ID:
22278300
Journal Information:
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics, Vol. 87, Issue 5; Other Information: Copyright (c) 2013 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); ISSN 0360-3016
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

The radiation oncology workforce: A focus on medical dosimetry
Journal Article · Tue Jul 01 00:00:00 EDT 2014 · Medical Dosimetry · OSTI ID:22278300

An Assessment of the Current US Radiation Oncology Workforce: Methodology and Global Results of the American Society for Radiation Oncology 2012 Workforce Study
Journal Article · Sun Dec 01 00:00:00 EST 2013 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:22278300

How Radiation Oncologists Would Disclose Errors: Results of a Survey of Radiation Oncologists and Trainees
Journal Article · Mon Oct 01 00:00:00 EDT 2012 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:22278300