Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

A critical comparison of ten disposable cup LCAs

Journal Article · · Environmental Impact Assessment Review
 [1]
  1. Environmental Systems Analysis Group, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 47, NL-6700 AA Wageningen (Netherlands)

Disposable cups can be made from conventional petro-plastics, bioplastics, or paperboard (coated with petro-plastics or bioplastics). This study compared ten life cycle assessment (LCA) studies of disposable cups with the aim to evaluate the robustness of their results. The selected studies have only one impact category in common, namely climate change with global warming potential (GWP) as its category indicator. Quantitative GWP results of the studies were closer examined. GWPs within and across each study show none of the cup materials to be consistently better than the others. Comparison of the absolute GWPs (after correction for the cup volume) also shows no consistent better or worse cup material. An evaluation of the methodological choices and the data sets used in the studies revealed their influence on the GWP. The differences in GWP can be attributed to a multitude of factors, i.e., cup material and weight, production processes, waste processes, allocation options, and data used. These factors basically represent different types of uncertainty. Sensitivity and scenario analyses provided only the influence of one factor at once. A systematic and simultaneous use of sensitivity and scenario analyses could, in a next research, result in more robust outcomes. -- Highlights: • Conflicting results from life cycle assessment (LCA) on disposable cups • GWP results of LCAs did not point to a best or worst cup material. • Differences in GWP results are due to methodological choices and data sets used. • Standardized LCA: transparency of LCA studies, but still different in approaches.

OSTI ID:
22246912
Journal Information:
Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Journal Name: Environmental Impact Assessment Review Vol. 43; ISSN 0195-9255; ISSN EIARDK
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

The use of LCA in selecting the best MSW management system
Journal Article · Mon Jun 15 00:00:00 EDT 2009 · Waste Management · OSTI ID:21269332

California's harvested wood products: A time-dependent assessment of life cycle greenhouse gas emissions
Journal Article · Mon May 08 00:00:00 EDT 2023 · Science of the Total Environment · OSTI ID:2425599

Paper waste - Recycling, incineration or landfilling? A review of existing life cycle assessments
Journal Article · Sun Jul 01 00:00:00 EDT 2007 · Waste Management · OSTI ID:21023888