Artificial intelligence-empowered cellular morphometric risk score improves prognostic stratification of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma

Journal Article · Sat Aug 12 00:00:00 EDT 2023 · Clinical and Experimental Dermatology

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/ced/llad264· OSTI ID:2217564

Pérez-Baena, Manuel J.; Mao, Jian-Hua; Pérez-Losada, Jesús; Santos-Briz, Ángel; Chang, Hang; Cañueto, Javier

Abstract Background Risk stratification of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is essential for managing patients. Objectives To determine if artificial intelligence and machine learning might help to stratify patients with cSCC by risk using more than solely clinical and histopathological factors. Methods We retrieved a retrospective cohort of 104 patients whose cSCCs had been excised with clear margins. Clinical and histopathological risk factors were evaluated. Haematoxylin and eosin-stained slides were scanned and analysed by an algorithm based on the stacked predictive sparse decomposition technique. Cellular morphometric biomarkers (CMBs) were identified via machine learning and used to derive a cellular morphometric risk score (CMRS) that classified cSCCs into clusters of differential prognoses. Concordance analysis, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy were calculated and compared with results obtained with the Brigham and Women’s Hospital (BWH) staging system. The performance of the combination of the BWH staging system and the CMBs was also analysed. Results There were no differences among the CMRS groups in terms of clinical and histopathological risk factors and T-stage assignment, but there were significant differences in prognosis. Combining the CMRS with BWH staging systems increased distinctiveness and improved prognostic performance. C-indices were 0.91 local recurrence and 0.91 for nodal metastasis when combining the two approaches. The NPV was 94.41% and 96.00%, the PPV was 36.36% and 41.67%, and accuracy reached 86.75% and 89.16%, respectively, with the combined approach. Conclusions CMRS is helpful for cSCC risk stratification beyond classic clinical and histopathological risk features. Combining the information from the CMRS and the BWH staging system offers outstanding prognostic performance for patients with high-risk cSCC.

• Sponsoring Organization: USDOE
• Grant/Contract Number: DE AC02-05CH11231; PID2020-118527RB-I00; MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011039; PDC2021-121735-I00; CSI234P18; CSI144P20; GRS2549/A/22
• OSTI ID: 2217564
• Journal Information: Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, Journal Name: Clinical and Experimental Dermatology; ISSN 0307-6938
• Publisher: Oxford University Press
• Country of Publication: United Kingdom
• Language: English