Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Randomized Trial of the SMART Stent versus Balloon Angioplasty in Long Superficial Femoral Artery Lesions: The SUPER Study

Journal Article · · Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology
 [1];  [2];  [3];  [4];  [5];  [6];  [7];  [8]
  1. Manchester Royal Infirmary, Department of Radiology (United Kingdom)
  2. James Cook University Hospital, Department of Radiology (United Kingdom)
  3. St. George's Healthcare NHS Trust, Department of Radiology (United Kingdom)
  4. Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Department of Radiology (United Kingdom)
  5. King's College Hospital, Department of Radiology (United Kingdom)
  6. Hull Royal Infirmary, Department of Radiology (United Kingdom)
  7. Johnson and Johnson Medical NV/SA, Cordis (Belgium)
  8. Johnson and Johnson Medical Ltd., Cordis (United Kingdom)

To determine whether primary stenting reduces the rate of restenosis compared with balloon angioplasty alone in the endovascular treatment of long superficial femoral artery lesions; and to assess the effect of treatment on quality of life. A total of 150 patients with superior femoral artery occlusion or severe stenosis of 5-22 cm length from 17 UK centers were randomized to either primary stenting with the SMART stent or balloon angioplasty (i.e., percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, PTA). Bailout stent placement was permitted in case of inadequate result from PTA. The primary end point was restenosis measured by duplex ultrasound at 1 year. Quality-of-life assessments were performed by the EuroQol (EQ)-5D questionnaire. Mean lesion length was 123.0 mm in the stent group and 116.8 mm in the PTA group. A total of 140 (93.3 %) of 150 had total occlusions. At 12 months' follow-up, restenosis measured by Duplex ultrasound was not significantly different between the stent and PTA groups by intention-to-treat or as-treated analyses: 47.2 versus 43.5 % (p = 0.84) and 40.8 versus 46.7 % (p = 0.68), respectively. There were fewer target lesion revascularizations in patients randomized to stenting, but this did not reach statistical significance (12.5 vs. 20.8 %, p = 0.26). There was no difference in the rate of amputation. Patients in both groups reported improved quality of life. Primary stenting of long lesions in predominantly occluded superficial femoral arteries does not reduce the rate of binary restenosis compared with balloon angioplasty and bailout stenting. Both treatment strategies conferred a meaningful and sustained improvement to the quality of life of patients with severe superficial femoral artery disease.

OSTI ID:
22156339
Journal Information:
Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Journal Name: Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology Journal Issue: 2 Vol. 36; ISSN 0174-1551; ISSN CAIRDG
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Cutting-Balloon Angioplasty Versus Balloon Angioplasty as Treatment for Short Atherosclerotic Lesions in the Superficial Femoral Artery: Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article · Sat Dec 14 23:00:00 EST 2013 · Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology · OSTI ID:22207969

Impact of Patient and Lesion Characteristics on Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty in the Femoropopliteal Artery: A Pooled Analysis of Four Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trials
Journal Article · Mon Apr 15 00:00:00 EDT 2019 · Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology · OSTI ID:22953097

The Role of 'Cutting' Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Short Femoral Bifurcation Steno-Obstructive Disease
Journal Article · Fri Oct 15 00:00:00 EDT 2010 · Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology · OSTI ID:21428922