skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Larynx-sparing techniques using intensity-modulated radiation therapy for oropharyngeal cancer

Journal Article · · Medical Dosimetry
 [1];  [2];  [1];  [1]; ;  [1]
  1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (United States)
  2. Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (United States)

The purpose of the current study was to explore whether the laryngeal dose can be reduced by using 2 intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) techniques: whole-neck field IMRT technique (WF-IMRT) vs. junctioned IMRT (J-IMRT). The effect on planning target volumes (PTVs) coverage and laryngeal sparing was evaluated. WF-IMRT technique consisted of a single IMRT plan, including the primary tumor and the superior and inferior neck to the level of the clavicular heads. The larynx was defined as an organ at risk extending superiorly to cover the arytenoid cartilages and inferiorly to include the cricoid cartilage. The J-IMRT technique consisted of an IMRT plan for the primary tumor and the superior neck, matched to conventional antero-posterior opposing lower neck fields at the level of the thyroid notch. A central block was used for the anterior lower neck field at the level of the larynx to restrict the dose to the larynx. Ten oropharyngeal cancer cases were analyzed. Both the primary site and bilateral regional lymphatics were included in the radiotherapy targets. The averaged V95 for the PTV57.6 was 99.2% for the WF-IMRT technique compared with 97.4% (p = 0.02) for J-IMRT. The averaged V95 for the PTV64 was 99.9% for the WF-IMRT technique compared with 98.9% (p = 0.02) for J-IMRT and the averaged V95 for the PT70 was 100.0% for WF-IMRT technique compared with 99.5% (p = 0.04) for J-IMRT. The averaged mean laryngeal dose was 18 Gy with both techniques. The averaged mean doses within the matchline volumes were 69.3 Gy for WF-MRT and 66.2 Gy for J-IMRT (p = 0.03). The WF-IMRT technique appears to offer an optimal coverage of the target volumes and a mean dose to the larynx similar with J-IMRT and should be further evaluated in clinical trials.

OSTI ID:
22131251
Journal Information:
Medical Dosimetry, Vol. 37, Issue 4; Other Information: Copyright (c) 2012 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); ISSN 0958-3947
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Helical Tomotherapy and Larynx Sparing in Advanced Oropharyngeal Carcinoma: A Dosimetric Study
Journal Article · Fri Oct 01 00:00:00 EDT 2010 · Medical Dosimetry · OSTI ID:22131251

Evaluation of Larynx-Sparing Techniques With IMRT When Treating the Head and Neck
Journal Article · Wed Oct 01 00:00:00 EDT 2008 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:22131251

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) of cancers of the head and neck: Comparison of split-field and whole-field techniques
Journal Article · Tue Nov 15 00:00:00 EST 2005 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:22131251