skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: The limits and challenges of error field correction for ITER

Journal Article · · Physics of Plasmas
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3694655· OSTI ID:22072389
; ; ;  [1];  [2];  [3]; ;  [4];  [1]; ; ;  [5]
  1. General Atomics, P.O. Box 85608, San Diego, California 92186-5608 (United States)
  2. Columbia University, New York, New York 10027 (United States)
  3. EURATOM/CCFE Fusion Association, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon OX14 3DB (United Kingdom)
  4. Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, Princeton, New Jersey 08543 (United States)
  5. ITER Organization, 13115 St. Paul Lez Durance (France)

Significant progress has been made in interpreting the effects of non-axisymmetric 'error' fields on a plasma through ideal MHD stability and a dominant 'least stable' ideal mode through which the fields couple to the tearing resonant surface. However, in contrast to expectations from such theories, experiments have found limited success in correcting error fields, with single correction coil arrays giving benefits of between 0% and {approx}50% correction (in terms of improvement to a low density locked mode limit), dependent on the structure of the error and correcting fields. With additional coils up to {approx}70% is possible. It was unclear whether this represented an intrinsic stability or control limit, or higher order toroidal or poloidal harmonic effects. Thus, studies on the DIII-D tokamak explored correction of a proxy error field, using two differently structured coil arrays. This enabled the principles of error correction to be tested at high amplitudes and operational densities, with known pure n=1 fields. Results showed substantial residual effects from the corrected n=1 field, with improvements of only {approx}50% in the low density locked mode limit. This suggests that n=1 error fields must couple to more than one surface in the plasma, and this is conjectured to be through more than one ideal mode, thereby requiring precise correction. For ITER, updated predictions of field error have been obtained and compared with revised scalings for tearing mode thresholds, indicating 50% or better error field correction will be needed. This will likely require more than one well coupled correction coil array and sets a challenge for theory to model the behavior, in order to clarify the plasma response and braking mechanisms, and so the effectiveness of ITER's correction coils and the possible need for support from its edge localized mode control coils.

OSTI ID:
22072389
Journal Information:
Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 19, Issue 5; Other Information: (c) 2012 American Institute of Physics; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); ISSN 1070-664X
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Magnetic control of magnetohydrodynamic instabilities in tokamaks
Journal Article · Mon Nov 24 00:00:00 EST 2014 · Physics of Plasmas · OSTI ID:22072389

Magnetic control of magnetohydrodynamic instabilities in tokamaks
Journal Article · Sun Feb 15 00:00:00 EST 2015 · Physics of Plasmas · OSTI ID:22072389

Impact of ideal MHD stability limits on high-beta hybrid operation
Journal Article · Thu Oct 27 00:00:00 EDT 2016 · Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion · OSTI ID:22072389