'Mind the Gap'-The Impact of Variations in the Duration of the Treatment Gap and Overall Treatment Time in the First UK Anal Cancer Trial (ACT I)
- Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Northwood (United Kingdom)
- St James's Institute of Oncology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds (United Kingdom)
- Cardiff University and Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff (United Kingdom)
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow (United Kingdom)
- North Wales Cancer Treatment Centre, Rhyl (United Kingdom)
- Kent Oncology Centre, Maidstone General Hospital, Maidstone (United Kingdom)
- Imperial Cancer Research Fund Colorectal Cancer Unit, St Mark's Hospital, Harrow (United Kingdom)
- Cancer Research UK and University College London Cancer Trials Centre, London (United Kingdom)
Purpose: The United Kingdom Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research anal cancer trial demonstrated the benefit of combined modality treatment (CMT) using radiotherapy (RT), infusional 5-fluorouracil, and mitomycin C over RT alone. The present study retrospectively examines the impact of the recommended 6-week treatment gap and local RT boost on long-term outcome. Methods and Materials: A total of 577 patients were randomly assigned RT alone or CMT. After a 6-week gap responders received a boost using either additional external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) (15 Gy) or iridium-192 implant (25 Gy). The effect of boost, the gap between initial treatment (RT alone or CMT) and boost (Tgap), and overall treatment time (OTT) were examined for their impact on outcome. Results: Among the 490 good responders, 436 (89%) patients received a boost after initial treatment. For boosted patients, the risk of anal cancer death decreased by 38% (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.62, 99% CI 0.35-1.12; p = 0.04), but there was no evidence this was mediated via a reduction in locoregional failure (LRF) (HR: 0.90, 99% CI 0.48-1.68; p = 0.66). The difference in Tgap was only 1.4 days longer for EBRT boost, compared with implant (p = 0.51). OTT was longer by 6.1 days for EBRT (p = 0.006). Tgap and OTT were not associated with LRF. Radionecrosis was reported in 8% of boosted, compared with 0% in unboosted patients (p = 0.03). Conclusions: These results question the benefit of a radiotherapy boost after a 6-week gap. The higher doses of a boost may contribute more to an increased risk of late morbidity, rather than local control.
- OSTI ID:
- 22054517
- Journal Information:
- International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics, Vol. 81, Issue 5; Other Information: Copyright (c) 2011 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); ISSN 0360-3016
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
A cosmetic evaluation of breast cancer treatment: A randomized study of radiotherapy boost technique
Preoperative infusional chemoradiation therapy for stage T3 rectal cancer