skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Market analysis for the integration of new power technologies: A case study of the deployment of hybrid fossil-based generator plus energy storage (ES-FE)

Journal Article · · Applied Energy
 [1];  [1];  [1];  [1];  [2];  [1];  [1]
  1. National Energy Technology Lab. (NETL), Pittsburgh, PA (United States)
  2. Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX (United States)

This study examines the national landscape of hybridized fossil energy (FE) power plants with energy storage (ES) technologies (“ES-FE”) and presents the compilation of an ES-FE dataset, which includes over 65 ES-FE projects and concepts in the United States, comprising approximately 500 MWh of co-located ES capacity with FE power plants. This study also estimates the economic feasibility of adding ES to existing FE power plants by characterizing the potential revenues that can be generated by the ES component through flexibility and capacity value. The analysis focuses on ES technologies with 2- to 10-h. durations located in four U.S. independent system operators (ISOs): Midcontinent ISO (MISO), Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT), PJM Interconnection (PJM), and California ISO (CAISO), which have +70,000 MW of combined FE power capacity that could add ES. Annual revenues are estimated for the ES component using a what-if-analysis approach, for capacity value, price arbitrage, or ancillary services provision. The results show that annual revenues depend on the end-use storage service, wholesale electricity and capacity market prices, and ES technology operation parameters such as discharging duration and cycling frequency. When performing a sensitivity analysis, ES accrues $7–178/kW-yr. via price arbitrage and ancillary services provision in the four ISOs, and $13–92/kW-yr. when providing capacity value only in MISO and PJM. A cash flow analysis is performed to estimate the net present value (NPV) of the ES addition using a range of ES costs. The study finds that for most ES technologies considered, these revenues alone are insufficient to achieve economic feasibility. In conclusion, of the 1645 total runs analyzed, 115 had positive NPVs (7%). Therefore, other revenue streams or monetizable benefits are necessary to achieve the break-even point.

Research Organization:
National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), Pittsburgh, PA, Morgantown, WV, and Albany, OR (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Fossil Energy (FE)
Grant/Contract Number:
FE0025912
OSTI ID:
2204033
Journal Information:
Applied Energy, Vol. 351; ISSN 0306-2619
Publisher:
ElsevierCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (6)

Energy storage: Applications and challenges journal January 2014
Economic Analysis of Electricity Storage Based on Heat Pumps and Thermal Storage Units in Large-Scale Thermal Power Plants journal December 2017
Motivations and options for deploying hybrid generator-plus-battery projects within the bulk power system journal June 2020
Using electricity storage to reduce greenhouse gas emissions journal January 2021
Value of technology in the U.S. electric power sector: Impacts of full portfolios and technological change on the costs of meeting decarbonization goals journal February 2020
How Decarbonization, Digitalization and Decentralization are changing key power infrastructures journal October 2018

Similar Records

Survey of U.S. Ancillary Services Markets
Technical Report · Wed Jun 01 00:00:00 EDT 2016 · OSTI ID:2204033

Land-Based Wind Market Report: 2022 Edition
Technical Report · Tue Aug 16 00:00:00 EDT 2022 · OSTI ID:2204033

Land-Based Wind Market Report: 2021 Edition
Technical Report · Mon Aug 30 00:00:00 EDT 2021 · OSTI ID:2204033