Comparing the use of mid-infrared versus far-infrared lasers for mitigating damage growth on fused silica
Laser-induced growth of optical damage can limit component lifetime and, therefore, increase operating costs of large-aperture fusion-class laser systems. While far-infrared (IR) lasers have been used previously to treat laser damage on fused silica optics and render it benign, little is known about the effectiveness of less-absorbing mid-IR lasers for this purpose. In this study, we quantitatively compare the effectiveness and efficiency of mid-IR (4.6 {mu}m) versus far-IR (10.6 {mu}m) lasers in mitigating damage growth on fused silica surfaces. The nonlinear volumetric heating due to mid-IR laser absorption is analyzed by solving the heat equation numerically, taking into account the temperature-dependent absorption coefficient {alpha}(T) at {lambda}=4.6 {mu}m, while far-IR laser heating is well described by a linear analytic approximation to the laser-driven temperature rise. In both cases, the predicted results agree well with surface temperature measurements based on IR radiometry, as well as subsurface fictive temperature measurements based on confocal Raman microscopy. Damage mitigation efficiency is assessed using a figure of merit (FOM) relating the crack healing depth to laser power required, under minimally ablative conditions. Based on our FOM, we show that, for cracks up to at least 500 {mu}m in depth, mitigation with a 4.6 {mu}m mid-IR laser is more efficient than mitigation with a 10.6 {mu}m far-IR laser. This conclusion is corroborated by direct application of each laser system to the mitigation of pulsed laser-induced damage possessing fractures up to 225 {mu}m in depth.
- OSTI ID:
- 22036495
- Journal Information:
- Applied Optics, Journal Name: Applied Optics Journal Issue: 14 Vol. 49; ISSN 0003-6935; ISSN APOPAI
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Comparison of laser-based mitigation of fused silica surface damage using mid- versus far-infrared lasers
Comparing the use of 4.6 um lasers versus 10.6 um lasers for mitigating damage site growth on fused silica surfaces
Fundamental Physical Mechanisms of Mitigation Approaches to Laser-Induced Damage on Ultraviolet Optics (FY08 LDRD Final Report)
Journal Article
·
Tue Dec 15 23:00:00 EST 2009
· Applied Optic, vol. 49, no. 14, May 10, 2010, pp. 2606-2616
·
OSTI ID:986617
Comparing the use of 4.6 um lasers versus 10.6 um lasers for mitigating damage site growth on fused silica surfaces
Conference
·
Thu Oct 21 00:00:00 EDT 2010
·
OSTI ID:1018773
Fundamental Physical Mechanisms of Mitigation Approaches to Laser-Induced Damage on Ultraviolet Optics (FY08 LDRD Final Report)
Technical Report
·
Thu Jul 12 00:00:00 EDT 2012
·
OSTI ID:1129971
Related Subjects
36 MATERIALS SCIENCE
71 CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS
GENERAL PHYSICS
ABSORPTION
APERTURES
APPROXIMATIONS
CRACKS
DAMAGE
EFFICIENCY
EQUATIONS
FAR INFRARED RADIATION
INTERMEDIATE INFRARED RADIATION
LASER RADIATION
LASER-RADIATION HEATING
LIFETIME
MICROSCOPY
MITIGATION
NONLINEAR PROBLEMS
OPTICS
SURFACES
TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE
TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT
71 CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS
GENERAL PHYSICS
ABSORPTION
APERTURES
APPROXIMATIONS
CRACKS
DAMAGE
EFFICIENCY
EQUATIONS
FAR INFRARED RADIATION
INTERMEDIATE INFRARED RADIATION
LASER RADIATION
LASER-RADIATION HEATING
LIFETIME
MICROSCOPY
MITIGATION
NONLINEAR PROBLEMS
OPTICS
SURFACES
TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE
TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT