skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Calibration of electret-based integral radon monitors using NIST polyethylene-encapsulated {sup 226}Ra/{sup 222}Rn emanation (PERE) standards

Journal Article · · Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology
;  [1];  [2]
  1. National Inst. of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD (United States)
  2. Rad Elec Inc., Frederick, MD (United States)

The recently developed {sup 222}Rn emanation standards that are based on polyethylene-encapsulated {sup 226}Ra solutions were employed for a first field-measurement application test to demonstrate their efficacy in calibrating passive integral radon monitors. The performance of the capsules was evaluated with respect to the calibration needs of electret ionization chambers (E-PERM{reg_sign}, Rad Elec Inc.). The encapsulated standards emanate well-characterized and known quantities of {sup 222}Rn, and were used in two different-sized, relatively-small, accumulation vessels (about 3.6 L and 10 L) which also contained the deployed electret monitors under test. Calculated integral {sup 222}Rn activities from the capsules over various accumulation times were compared to the averaged electret responses. Evaluations were made with four encapsulated standards ranging in {sup 226}Ra activity from approximately 15 Bq to 540 Bq (with {sup 222}Rn emanation fractions of 0.888); over accumulation times from 1 d to 33 d; and with four different types of E-PERM detectors that were independently calibrated. The ratio of the electret chamber response E{sub Rn} to the integral {sup 222}Rn activity I{sub Rn} was constant (within statistical variations) over the variables of the specific capsule used, the accumulation volume, accumulation time, and detector type. The results clearly demonstrated the practicality and suitability of the encapsulated standards for providing a simple and readily-available calibration for those measurement applications. However, the mean ratio E{sub Rn}/I{sub Rn} was approximately 0.91, suggesting a possible systematic bias in the extant E-PERM calibrations. This 9% systematic difference was verified by an independent test of the E-PERM calibration based on measurements with the NIST radon-in-water standard generator.

Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE
OSTI ID:
218539
Journal Information:
Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Vol. 100, Issue 6; Other Information: PBD: Nov-Dec 1995
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English