skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Comparison of BMSs with SES for Symptomatic Intracranial Disease of the Middle Cerebral Artery Stenosis

Journal Article · · Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology
;  [1];  [2]; ; ; ; ;  [1];  [3]
  1. Nanjing University School of Medicine, Department of Neurology, Jinling Hospital (China)
  2. Yunyang Medical College, Department of Neurology, Shiyan People Hospital (China)
  3. Nanjing Medical University, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health (China)

This study was designed to compare the clinical and angiographic outcomes of patients with symptomatic atherosclerotic middle cerebral artery stenosis treated with balloon-mounted stents (BMS) and self-expandable Wingspan system (SES). We reviewed the 69 consecutive stent placement procedures for symptomatic atherosclerotic stenosis ({>=}70) in M1 segment of middle cerebral artery in 67 patients in 3 years. According to the stent types, the patients were classed as BMS and SES groups. The demographic characteristics, conventional risk factors of ischemic stroke, degree of stenosis, periprocedural complications, stent types, and clinical and angiographic outcomes were analyzed. There were 39 patients in the BMS group and 28 patients in the SES group. The demographic characteristics, conventional risk factors, and periprocedural complications were similar but different in residual stenosis after stenting in both groups (5.9% {+-} 9.9% vs. 14.4% {+-} 14.6%; P = 0.01). For the overall cohort, the rate of stroke or death and restenosis was 10.9% (7/66) and 24.5% (14/57), respectively. The frequency of restenosis was higher in the SES group than in the BMS group (log-rank, P = 0.04; crude hazard ratio = 3.03; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01-9.15; P = 0.049; and adjusted hazard ratio = 3.61; 95% CI, 1.06-12.27; P = 0.04); however, there was no difference in clinical outcomes (log-rank, P = 0.51; crude hazard ratio = 1.66; 95% CI, 0.36-7.61; P = 0.51; and adjusted hazard ratio = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.04-7.89; P = 0.69). The corrected degree of restenosis was higher in the SES than the BMS group. The prevalence of restenosis was higher in the SES than the BMS group, but the perioperative complications and follow-up clinical outcomes had no significant difference.

OSTI ID:
21608819
Journal Information:
Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Vol. 34, Issue 1; Conference: BSIR 2010: Annual meeting of the British Society of Interventional Radiology, Liverpool (United Kingdom), 3-5 Nov 2010; Other Information: DOI: 10.1007/s00270-010-9885-z; Copyright (c) 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE); Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); ISSN 0174-1551
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Restenosis Rates After Drug-Eluting Stent Treatment for Stenotic Small-Diameter Renal Arteries
Journal Article · Sun Sep 15 00:00:00 EDT 2019 · Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology · OSTI ID:21608819

Wingspan Stent for High-Grade Symptomatic Vertebrobasilar Artery Atherosclerotic Stenosis
Journal Article · Sun Apr 15 00:00:00 EDT 2012 · Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology · OSTI ID:21608819

Influence of Vessel Size and Tortuosity on In-stent Restenosis After Stent Implantation in the Vertebral Artery Ostium
Journal Article · Wed Jun 15 00:00:00 EDT 2011 · Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology · OSTI ID:21608819