skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Intra-Arterial Hepatic Chemotherapy: A Comparison of Percutaneous Versus Surgical Implantation of Port-Catheters

Journal Article · · Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology
 [1]; ;  [2]; ; ;  [3];  [4]
  1. Gustave Roussy Institut, Department of Interventional Radiology (France)
  2. Gustave Roussy Institut, Department of Surgery (France)
  3. Gustave Roussy Institut, Department of Medical Oncology (France)
  4. Gustave Roussy Institut, Department of Statistics (France)

Purpose: To compare retrospectively the safety and efficacy of percutaneous and surgical implantations of port-catheters for intra-arterial hepatic chemotherapy (IAHC). Materials and Methods: Between January 2004 and December 2008, 126 consecutive patients (mean age 58 years) suffering from liver colorectal metastases were referred for intra-arterial hepatic chemotherapy (IAHC). Port-catheters were percutaneously implanted (P) through femoral access with the patient under conscious sedation when no other surgery was planned or were surgically implanted (S) when laparotomy was performed for another purpose. We report the implantation success rate, primary functionality, functionality after revision, and complications of IAHC. Results: The success rates of implantation were 97% (n = 65 of 67) for P and 98% (n = 58 of 59) for S. One hundred eleven patients received IAHC in our institution (n = 56P and n = 55S). Primary functionality was the same for P and S (4.80 vs. 4.82 courses), but functionality after revision was significantly higher for P (9.18 vs. 5.95 courses, p = 0.004) than for S. Forty-five complications occurred during 516 courses for P and 28 complications occurred during 331 courses for S. The rates of discontinuation of IAHC linked to complications of the port-catheters were 21% (n = 12 of 56) for P and 34% (n = 19 of 55) for S. Conclusion: Overall, significantly better functionality and similar complication rates occurred after P versus S port-catheters.

OSTI ID:
21608576
Journal Information:
Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Vol. 34, Issue 5; Other Information: DOI: 10.1007/s00270-010-9996-6; Copyright (c) 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE); Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); ISSN 0174-1551
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Complications of Transfemoral Removal of Percutaneous Transfemorally Implanted Port-Catheter Systems
Journal Article · Sun Oct 15 00:00:00 EDT 2006 · Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology · OSTI ID:21608576

Percutaneous Implantation of a Catheter with Subcutaneous Reservoir for Intraarterial Regional Chemotherapy: Technique and Preliminary Results
Journal Article · Wed Mar 15 00:00:00 EST 2000 · Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology · OSTI ID:21608576

Percutaneous implantation of a Port-Catheter System using the left subclavian artery
Journal Article · Sat Jan 15 00:00:00 EST 2000 · Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology · OSTI ID:21608576