skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: KEPLER-10 c: A 2.2 EARTH RADIUS TRANSITING PLANET IN A MULTIPLE SYSTEM

Journal Article · · Astrophysical Journal, Supplement Series
; ; ; ;  [1];  [2]; ;  [3]; ; ; ; ;  [4];  [5];  [6];  [7];  [8];  [9];  [10]
  1. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA 02138 (United States)
  2. Department of Physics, San Jose State University, San Jose, CA 95192 (United States)
  3. Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 (United States)
  4. NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035 (United States)
  5. Las Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope, Goleta, CA 93117 (United States)
  6. NASA Exoplanet Science Institute/Caltech, Pasadena, CA 91125 (United States)
  7. McDonald Observatory, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712 (United States)
  8. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771 (United States)
  9. Lowell Observatory, Flagstaff, AZ 86001 (United States)
  10. Jet Propulsion Laboratory/California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109 (United States)

The Kepler mission has recently announced the discovery of Kepler-10 b, the smallest exoplanet discovered to date and the first rocky planet found by the spacecraft. A second, 45 day period transit-like signal present in the photometry from the first eight months of data could not be confirmed as being caused by a planet at the time of that announcement. Here we apply the light curve modeling technique known as BLENDER to explore the possibility that the signal might be due to an astrophysical false positive (blend). To aid in this analysis we report the observation of two transits with the Spitzer Space Telescope at 4.5 {mu}m. When combined, they yield a transit depth of 344 {+-} 85 ppm that is consistent with the depth in the Kepler passband (376 {+-} 9 ppm, ignoring limb darkening), which rules out blends with an eclipsing binary of a significantly different color than the target. Using these observations along with other constraints from high-resolution imaging and spectroscopy, we are able to exclude the vast majority of possible false positives. We assess the likelihood of the remaining blends, and arrive conservatively at a false alarm rate of 1.6 x 10{sup -5} that is small enough to validate the candidate as a planet (designated Kepler-10 c) with a very high level of confidence. The radius of this object is measured to be R{sub p} = 2.227{sup +0.052}{sub -0.057} R{sub +} (in which the error includes the uncertainty in the stellar properties), but currently available radial-velocity measurements only place an upper limit on its mass of about 20 M{sub +}. Kepler-10 c represents another example (with Kepler-9 d and Kepler-11 g) of statistical 'validation' of a transiting exoplanet, as opposed to the usual 'confirmation' that can take place when the Doppler signal is detected or transit timing variations are measured. It is anticipated that many of Kepler's smaller candidates will receive a similar treatment since dynamical confirmation may be difficult or impractical with the sensitivity of current instrumentation.

OSTI ID:
21562416
Journal Information:
Astrophysical Journal, Supplement Series, Vol. 197, Issue 1; Other Information: DOI: 10.1088/0067-0049/197/1/5; ISSN 0067-0049
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English