Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Comment on ''Semiquantum-key distribution using less than four quantum states''

Journal Article · · Physical Review. A
 [1];  [2]
  1. Departement IRO, Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec H3C 3J7 (Canada)
  2. Computer Science Department, Technion, Haifa 32000 (Israel)
For several decades it was believed that information-secure key distribution requires both the sender and receiver to have the ability to generate and/or manipulate quantum states. Earlier, we showed that quantum key distribution in which one party is classical is possible [Boyer, Kenigsberg, and Mor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 140501 (2007)]. A surprising and very nice extension of that result was suggested by Zou, Qiu, Li, Wu, and Li [Phys. Rev. A 79, 052312 (2009)]. Their paper suggests that it is sufficient for the originator of the states (the person holding the quantum technology) to generate just one state. The resulting semiquantum key distribution, which we call here 'quantum key distribution with classical Alice' is indeed completely robust against eavesdropping. However, their proof (that no eavesdropper can get information without being possibly detected) is faulty. We provide here a fully detailed and direct proof of their very important result.
OSTI ID:
21544740
Journal Information:
Physical Review. A, Journal Name: Physical Review. A Journal Issue: 4 Vol. 83; ISSN 1050-2947; ISSN PLRAAN
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Reply to ''Comment on 'Semiquantum-key distribution using less than four quantum states'''
Journal Article · Fri Apr 15 00:00:00 EDT 2011 · Physical Review. A · OSTI ID:21544741

Semiquantum-key distribution using less than four quantum states
Journal Article · Fri May 15 00:00:00 EDT 2009 · Physical Review. A · OSTI ID:21300820

Semiquantum secret sharing using entangled states
Journal Article · Sun Aug 15 00:00:00 EDT 2010 · Physical Review. A · OSTI ID:21448450