Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Revision of three-stakeholder signaling game for environmental impact assessment in China

Journal Article · · Environmental Impact Assessment Review
OSTI ID:21499663
 [1]; ;  [1];  [2]
  1. School of Environment, Beijing Normal University No. 19, Xinjiekouwai Street, Beijing 100875 (China)
  2. School of Public Policy and Management, Tsinghua University No. 1, Qinghuayuan Street, Beijing 100084 (China)

Since environmental impact assessment (EIA) regulations were adopted in China 30 years ago, the implementation rate of EIA policies for development projects has been steadily increasing while national environmental quality keeps deteriorating. This contradiction prevents achievement of the goals that the regulations were originally created for, raising concerns regarding the EIA implementation process. One of the objectives of EIA is the evaluation of socio-economic costs introduced by various commercial activities. However, independent economic entities are inclined to break away from these cost related responsibilities, making it necessary for government agencies and EIA organizations to participate in the evaluation process. The practice of avoiding costs may also bring forth other issues, such as rent-seeking behavior and conspiracies. Reducing private costs and the tendency of the three EIA stakeholders to evade social responsibility are intertwined in every EIA process. Their activities are as follows: The government is the lawmaker whose attitude toward the EIA organization determines how business owners react in the EIA process. The government inclination can be interpreted as a signal from which enterprises can determine the nature of the government, which helps the enterprise owners formulate their future actions. A similar relationship also exists among the government, EIA organizations, and enterprise entities. Fundamentally, the correlations between the EIA stakeholders are determined by their socio-economic situation, namely, the economic costs and benefits they encounter. In this article, signaling game theory derived from the classic game theory is applied to describe the EIA process in China by analyzing the activities of the stakeholders and searching for game equilibrium solutions. The optimal reaction schema for stakeholders was obtained by transforming the equilibrium.

OSTI ID:
21499663
Journal Information:
Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Journal Name: Environmental Impact Assessment Review Journal Issue: 2 Vol. 31; ISSN 0195-9255; ISSN EIARDK
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Biomedical technology prosperity game{trademark}
Technical Report · Mon Jul 01 00:00:00 EDT 1996 · OSTI ID:266891

Future{at}Labs.Prosperity Game{trademark}
Technical Report · Tue Oct 01 00:00:00 EDT 1996 · OSTI ID:569104

Stakeholders' manipulation of Environmental Impact Assessment
Journal Article · Sun Jan 14 23:00:00 EST 2018 · Environmental Impact Assessment Review · OSTI ID:22826034