Re-evaluating Sustainability Assessment: Aligning the vision and the practice

Journal Article · Sat Jan 15 04:00:00 EST 2011 · Environmental Impact Assessment Review

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2010.01.007· OSTI ID:21499138

Morrison-Saunders, Angus ^[1]

---

1. School of Environmental Science, Murdoch University, South St, Murdoch WA 6150 (Australia)

Sustainable Development is the core goal of the expanding field of Sustainability Assessment (SA). However, we find that three key areas of debate in relation to SA practice in England and Western Australia can be classified as policy controversies. Through literature review and analysis of documentary evidence we consider the problem of reductionism (breaking down complex processes to simple terms or component parts) as opposed to holism (considering systems as wholes); the issue of contested understandings of the meaning of sustainability (and of the purpose of SA); and the definition of 'inter-generational' in the context of sustainable development and how this is reflected in the timescales considered in SA. We argue that SA practice is based on particular framings of the policy controversies and that the critical role of SA in facilitating deliberation over these controversies needs to be recognised if there is to be a move towards a new deliberative sustainability discourse which can accommodate these different framings.

• OSTI ID: 21499138
• Journal Information: Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Journal Name: Environmental Impact Assessment Review Journal Issue: 1 Vol. 31; ISSN 0195-9255; ISSN EIARDK
• Country of Publication: United States
• Language: English

Related Subjects

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY
AUSTRALASIA
AUSTRALIA
DEVELOPED COUNTRIES
DOCUMENT TYPES
ECONOMIC POLICY
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
EUROPE
GOVERNMENT POLICIES
RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT
REVIEWS
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
UNITED KINGDOM
WESTERN AUSTRALIA
WESTERN EUROPE