Prospective Imaging Assessment of Mortality Risk After Head-and-Neck Radiotherapy
Journal Article
·
· International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (United States)
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (United States)
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (United States)
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (United States)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (United States)
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (United States)
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (United States)
Purpose: The optimal roles for imaging-based biomarkers in the management of head-and-neck cancer remain undefined. Unresolved questions include whether functional or anatomic imaging might improve mortality risk assessment for this disease. We addressed these issues in a prospective institutional trial. Methods and Materials: Ninety-eight patients with locally advanced pharyngolaryngeal squamous cell cancer were enrolled. Each underwent pre- and post-chemoradiotherapy contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and {sup 18}F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)/CT imaging. Imaging parameters were correlated with survival outcomes. Results: Low post-radiation primary tumor FDG avidity correlated with improved survival on multivariate analysis; so too did complete primary tumor response by CT alone. Although both imaging modalities lacked sensitivity, each had high specificity and negative predictive value for disease-specific mortality risk assessment. Kaplan-Meier estimates confirmed that both CT and FDG-PET/CT stratify patients into distinct high- and low-probability survivorship groups on the basis of primary tumor response to radiotherapy. Subset analyses demonstrated that the prognostic value for each imaging modality was primarily derived from patients at high risk for local treatment failure (human papillomavirus [HPV]-negative disease, nonoropharyngeal primary disease, or tobacco use). Conclusions: CT alone and FDG-PET/CT are potentially useful tools in head-and-neck cancer-specific mortality risk assessment after radiotherapy, particularly for selective use in cases of high-risk HPV-unrelated disease. Focus should be placed on corroboration and refinement of patient selection for imaging-based biomarkers in future studies.
- OSTI ID:
- 21437993
- Journal Information:
- International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics, Journal Name: International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics Journal Issue: 3 Vol. 78; ISSN IOBPD3; ISSN 0360-3016
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Intraobserver and Interobserver Variability in GTV Delineation on FDG-PET-CT Images of Head and Neck Cancers
Validation that Metabolic Tumor Volume Predicts Outcome in Head-and-Neck Cancer
The Role of PET/CT with {sup 18}F-FDG in the Assessment of Therapeutic Response of Head and Neck Cancer
Journal Article
·
Sun Jul 01 00:00:00 EDT 2007
· International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
·
OSTI ID:20951703
Validation that Metabolic Tumor Volume Predicts Outcome in Head-and-Neck Cancer
Journal Article
·
Wed Aug 01 00:00:00 EDT 2012
· International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
·
OSTI ID:22149402
The Role of PET/CT with {sup 18}F-FDG in the Assessment of Therapeutic Response of Head and Neck Cancer
Journal Article
·
Wed Feb 14 23:00:00 EST 2018
· Current Radiology Reports
·
OSTI ID:22876207
Related Subjects
62 RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE
ANTIMETABOLITES
BETA DECAY RADIOISOTOPES
BETA-PLUS DECAY RADIOISOTOPES
BIOLOGICAL MARKERS
BODY
COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY
DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES
DIGESTIVE SYSTEM
DISEASES
DRUGS
EMISSION COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY
FLUORINE 18
FLUORINE ISOTOPES
FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE
HAZARDS
HEAD
HEALTH HAZARDS
HOURS LIVING RADIOISOTOPES
ISOMERIC TRANSITION ISOTOPES
ISOTOPES
LIGHT NUCLEI
MEDICINE
MORTALITY
NANOSECONDS LIVING RADIOISOTOPES
NECK
NEOPLASMS
NUCLEAR MEDICINE
NUCLEI
ODD-ODD NUCLEI
ORGANS
PHARYNX
POSITRON COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY
RADIATION HAZARDS
RADIOISOTOPES
RADIOLOGY
RADIOTHERAPY
RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
RISK ASSESSMENT
THERAPY
TOMOGRAPHY
ANTIMETABOLITES
BETA DECAY RADIOISOTOPES
BETA-PLUS DECAY RADIOISOTOPES
BIOLOGICAL MARKERS
BODY
COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY
DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES
DIGESTIVE SYSTEM
DISEASES
DRUGS
EMISSION COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY
FLUORINE 18
FLUORINE ISOTOPES
FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE
HAZARDS
HEAD
HEALTH HAZARDS
HOURS LIVING RADIOISOTOPES
ISOMERIC TRANSITION ISOTOPES
ISOTOPES
LIGHT NUCLEI
MEDICINE
MORTALITY
NANOSECONDS LIVING RADIOISOTOPES
NECK
NEOPLASMS
NUCLEAR MEDICINE
NUCLEI
ODD-ODD NUCLEI
ORGANS
PHARYNX
POSITRON COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY
RADIATION HAZARDS
RADIOISOTOPES
RADIOLOGY
RADIOTHERAPY
RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
RISK ASSESSMENT
THERAPY
TOMOGRAPHY