skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: A Comparison of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy and Conventional Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Frontal and Temporal High-Grade Gliomas

Journal Article · · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
 [1];  [2]; ;  [3]; ;  [2]; ;  [1];  [2]
  1. Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia (Canada)
  2. Department of Medical Physics, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia (Canada)
  3. Department of Radiation Therapy, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia (Canada)

Purpose: Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), the predecessor to Varian's RapidArc, is a novel extension of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) wherein the dose is delivered in a single gantry rotation while the multileaf collimator leaves are in motion. Leaf positions and the weights of field samples along the arc are directly optimized, and a variable dose rate is used. This planning study compared seven-field coplanar IMRT (cIMRT) with VMAT for high-grade gliomas that had planning target volumes (PTVs) overlapping organs at risk (OARs). Methods and Materials: 10 previously treated patients were replanned to 60 Gy in 30 fractions with cIMRT and VMAT using the following planning objectives: 98% of PTV covered by 95% isodose without violating OAR and hotspot dose constraints. Mean OAR doses were maximally decreased without reducing PTV coverage or violating hotspot constraints. We compared dose-volume histogram data, monitor units, and treatment times. Results: There was equivalent PTV coverage, homogeneity, and conformality. VMAT significantly reduced maximum and mean retinal, lens, and contralateral optic nerve doses compared with IMRT (p < 0.05). Brainstem, chiasm, and ipsilateral optic nerve doses were similar. For 2-Gy fractions, mean monitor units were as follows: cIMRT = 789 +- 112 and VMAT = 363 +- 45 (relative reduction 54%, p = 0.002), and mean treatment times (min) were as follows: cIMRT = 5.1 +- 0.4 and VMAT = 1.8 +- 0.1 (relative reduction 65%, p = 0.002). Conclusions: Compared with cIMRT, VMAT achieved equal or better PTV coverage and OAR sparing while using fewer monitor units and less time to treat high-grade gliomas.

OSTI ID:
21372178
Journal Information:
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics, Vol. 76, Issue 4; Other Information: DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.03.013; PII: S0360-3016(09)00419-2; Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.; ISSN 0360-3016
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English