THE OPTX PROJECT. III. X-RAY VERSUS OPTICAL SPECTRAL TYPE FOR ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI
Journal Article
·
· Astrophysical Journal
- Department of Astronomy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 475 North Charter Street, Madison, WI 53706 (United States)
- Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii, 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, HI 96822 (United States)
- Department of Astronomy, University of Illinois, 1002 West Green Street, Urbana, IL 61801 (United States)
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Code 662, Greenbelt, MD 20771 (United States)
We compare the optical spectral types with the X-ray spectral properties for a uniformly selected (sources with fluxes greater than the 3sigma level and above a flux limit of f {sub 2-8keV} > 3.5 x 10{sup -15} erg cm{sup -2} s{sup -1}), highly spectroscopically complete (>80% for f {sub 2-8keV} > 10{sup -14} erg cm{sup -2} s{sup -1} and >60% below) 2-8 keV X-ray sample observed in three Chandra fields (CLANS, CLASXS, and the CDF-N) that cover approx1.2 deg{sup 2}. For our sample of 645 spectroscopically observed sources, we confirm that there is significant overlap of the X-ray spectral properties, as determined by the effective photon indices, GAMMA{sub eff}, obtained from the ratios of the 0.5-2 keV to 2-8 keV counts, for the different optical spectral types. For example, broad-line active galactic nuclei (AGNs) are expected to be unobscured and hence X-ray soft (GAMMA{sub eff} >= 1.2), yet we find 20%+- 3% have GAMMA{sub eff} <1.2. Non-broad-line AGNs are expected to be obscured and hence X-ray hard (GAMMA{sub eff} < 1.2), yet we find 33% +- 4% have GAMMA{sub eff} >= 1.2. Thus, one cannot use the X-ray spectral classifications and the optical spectral classifications equivalently. Since it is not understood how X-ray and optical classifications relate to the obscuration of the central engine, we strongly advise against a mixed classification scheme, as it can only complicate the interpretation of X-ray AGN samples. We confirm the dependence of optical spectral type on X-ray luminosity, and for z < 1, we find a similar luminosity dependence of GAMMA{sub eff}. However, this dependence breaks down at higher redshifts due to the highly redshift-dependent nature of GAMMA{sub eff}. We therefore also caution that any classification scheme which depends on GAMMA{sub eff} is likely to suffer from serious redshift bias.
- OSTI ID:
- 21371814
- Journal Information:
- Astrophysical Journal, Journal Name: Astrophysical Journal Journal Issue: 2 Vol. 703; ISSN ASJOAB; ISSN 0004-637X
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
THE OPTX PROJECT. IV. HOW RELIABLE IS [O III] AS A MEASURE OF AGN ACTIVITY?
THE COSMOS ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEUS SPECTROSCOPIC SURVEY. I. XMM-NEWTON COUNTERPARTS
THE POPULATION OF HIGH-REDSHIFT ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI IN THE CHANDRA-COSMOS SURVEY
Journal Article
·
Sun Oct 10 00:00:00 EDT 2010
· Astrophysical Journal
·
OSTI ID:21464711
THE COSMOS ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEUS SPECTROSCOPIC SURVEY. I. XMM-NEWTON COUNTERPARTS
Journal Article
·
Sun May 10 00:00:00 EDT 2009
· Astrophysical Journal
·
OSTI ID:21300712
THE POPULATION OF HIGH-REDSHIFT ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI IN THE CHANDRA-COSMOS SURVEY
Journal Article
·
Wed Nov 09 23:00:00 EST 2011
· Astrophysical Journal
·
OSTI ID:21612698