skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Long-Term Toxicity Following 3D Conformal Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer From the RTOG 9406 Phase I/II Dose Escalation Study

Journal Article · · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
 [1];  [2];  [3];  [4];  [5];  [6];  [7];  [8];  [9]
  1. Department of Statistics, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Philadelphia, PA (United States)
  2. Radiation Oncology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA (United States)
  3. Radiation Oncology, University Miami, Miami, FL (United States)
  4. Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (United States)
  5. Radiation Oncology, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA (United States)
  6. Radiation Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AL (Canada)
  7. Image-guided Therapy Center, St. Louis, MO (United States)
  8. Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (United States)
  9. Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (United States)

Purpose: To update the incidence of late toxicity of RTOG 9406, a three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) dose escalation trial for prostate cancer. Methods and Materials: A total of 1,084 men were registered to this Phase I/II trial of 3DCRT (eligible patients, 1,055). The dose for level I was 68.4 Gy; 73.8 Gy for level II; 79.2 Gy for level III; 74 Gy for level IV; and 78 Gy for level V. Patients in levels I to III received 1.8 Gy/fraction, and those in levels IV to V received 2.0 Gy/fraction. Disease group I patients were treated at the prostate only, group 2 patients were treated at the prostate and at the seminal vesicles with a prostate boost, and group 3 patients were treated at the prostate and seminal vesicles. The median follow-up period for surviving patients was 6.1 y (level V) to 12.1 y (level I). Results: The incidence rates of RTOG grade 3 or less gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicity were 3%, 4%, 6%, 7%, and 9% in group 1 and 6%, 2%, 6%, 9%, and 12% in group 2 at dose levels of I, II, III, IV, and V, respectively. In group 1, level V patients had a higher probability of grade2 late or greater gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicity than those in levels I, II, and III (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.93, p = 0.0101; HR = 2.29, p = 0.0007; HR = 2.52, p = 0.0002, respectively). In group 2, dose level V patients had a higher probability of grade 2 or greater late gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicity than those in dose levels II, III, and IV (HR = 2.61, p = 0.0002; HR = 2.22, p = 0.0051; HR = 1.60, p = 0.0276, respectively). Conclusions: Tolerance to high-dose 3DCRT remains excellent. There is significantly more grade 2 or greater toxicity with a dose of 78 Gy at 2 Gy/fraction than with 68.4 Gy to 79.2 Gy at 1.8 Gy/fraction and with 74 Gy at 2 Gy/fraction.

OSTI ID:
21367579
Journal Information:
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics, Vol. 76, Issue 1; Other Information: DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.01.062; PII: S0360-3016(09)00210-7; Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.; ISSN 0360-3016
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English