Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Adaptive Replanning Strategies Accounting for Shrinkage in Head and Neck IMRT

Journal Article · · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
OSTI ID:21367483
; ; ; ;  [1]
  1. Department of Radiation Oncology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI (United States)
Purpose: Significant anatomic and volumetric changes occur in head and neck cancer patients during fractionated radiotherapy, and the actual dose can be considerably different from the original plan. The purposes of this study were (1) to evaluate the differences between planned and delivered dose, (2) to investigate margins required for anatomic changes, and (3) to find optimal replanning strategies. Methods and Materials: Eleven patients, each with one planning and six weekly helical CTs, were included. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans were generated using the simultaneous integrated boost technique. Weekly CTs were rigidly registered to planning CT before deformable registration was performed. The following replanning strategies were investigated with different margins (0, 3, 5 mm): midcourse (one replan), every other week (two replans), and every week (six replans). Doses were accumulated on the planning CT for comparison of various dose indices for target and critical structures. Results: The cumulative doses to targets were preserved even at the 0-mm margin. Doses to cord, brainstem, and mandible were unchanged. Significant increases in parotid doses were observed. Margin reduction from 5 to 0 mm led to a 22% improvement in parotid mean dose. Parotid sparing could be preserved with replanning. More frequent replanning led to better preservation; replanning more than once a week is unnecessary. Conclusion: Shrinkage does not result in significant dosimetric difference in targets and critical structures, except for the parotid gland, for which the mean dose increases by approx10%. The benefit of replanning is improved sparing of the parotid. The combination of replanning and reduced margins can provide up to a 30% difference in parotid dose.
OSTI ID:
21367483
Journal Information:
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics, Journal Name: International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics Journal Issue: 3 Vol. 75; ISSN IOBPD3; ISSN 0360-3016
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Automated Weekly Replanning for Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy of Cervix Cancer
Journal Article · Fri Oct 01 00:00:00 EDT 2010 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:21436173

Online Adaptive Replanning Method for Prostate Radiotherapy
Journal Article · Sun Aug 01 00:00:00 EDT 2010 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:21436130

Clinical Study of the Necessity of Replanning Before the 25th Fraction During the Course of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Patients With Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Journal Article · Tue Jun 01 00:00:00 EDT 2010 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:21372316