Reviewing the quality of strategic environmental assessment reports for English spatial plan core strategies
- Department of Civic Design, University of Liverpool, 74 Bedford Street South, Liverpool L69 7ZQ (United Kingdom)
This paper summarises the results of a research project from early 2008, involving the author of this paper, as well as 18 post-graduate University of Liverpool students, in which the quality of European Directive based strategic environmental assessment (SEA) reports of English spatial plan core strategies (conducted within the context of the spatial planning sustainability appraisal-SA-regime) was reviewed. The project aimed at establishing the extensiveness of emerging spatial plan related SEA practice, as well as highlighting shortcomings and problems. Overall, it was found that whilst some aspects of assessment were done well, others were not of a satisfactory quality. Shortcomings were connected particularly with the practice of listing potentially relevant baseline documents and data without distinguishing sufficiently between those that are important in terms of significant impacts and those that are not. Problems were also found to exist with the evaluation of options and impacts, the consideration of substantive aspects, such as health, as well as regarding the formulation of final recommendations and monitoring.
- OSTI ID:
- 21364701
- Journal Information:
- Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Vol. 30, Issue 1; Other Information: DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2009.04.002; PII: S0195-9255(09)00066-3; Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.; ISSN 0195-9255
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Use of sustainability appraisal by English planning inspectors and judges
Should different impact assessment instruments be integrated? Evidence from English spatial planning