Pay as you throw
- Division of Waste Science and Technology, Lulea University of Technology, SE-971 87 Lulea (Sweden)
Householders' response to weight-based billing for the collection of household waste was investigated with the aim of providing decision support for waste management policies. Three questions were addressed: How much and what kind of information on weight-based billing is discernible in generic Swedish waste collection statistics? Why do local authorities implement weight-based billing, and how do they perceive the results? and, Which strengths and weaknesses of weight-based billing have been observed on the local level? The study showed that municipalities with pay-by-weight schemes collected 20% less household waste per capita than other municipalities. Surprisingly, no part of this difference could be explained by higher recycling rates. Nevertheless, the majority of waste management professionals were convinced that recycling had increased as a result of the billing system. A number of contradicting strengths and weaknesses of weight-based billing were revealed.
- OSTI ID:
- 21357630
- Journal Information:
- Waste Management, Vol. 30, Issue 1; Other Information: DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2009.09.022; PII: S0956-053X(09)00376-6; Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.; ISSN 0956-053X
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
A New Appraisal- Lessons from the History of Efforts to Value Green and High-Performance Home Attributes in the United States
An econometric analysis of regional differences in household waste collection: The case of plastic packaging waste in Sweden