skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: 3D-Conformal Versus Intensity-Modulated Postoperative Radiotherapy of Vaginal Vault: A Dosimetric Comparison

Journal Article · · Medical Dosimetry
 [1];  [2]; ; ;  [2];  [3];  [4];  [2];  [5];  [1];  [2]
  1. Medical Physics Unit, Department of Oncology, 'John Paul II' Center for High Technology Research and Education in Biomedical Sciences, Catholic University, Campobasso (Italy)
  2. Radiotherapy Unit, Department of Oncology, 'John Paul II' Center for High Technology Research and Education in Biomedical Sciences, Catholic University, Campobasso (Italy)
  3. Gynaecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, 'John Paul II' Center for High Technology Research and Education in Biomedical Sciences, Catholic University, Campobasso (Italy)
  4. Department of Radiation Oncology, The Lacks Cancer Center Saint Mary's Health Care, Grand Rapids, MI (United States)
  5. Gynaecology/Obstetrics Department, Policlinico A. Gemelli, Catholic University, Rome (Italy)

We evaluated a step-and-shoot IMRT plan in the postoperative irradiation of the vaginal vault compared with equispaced beam arrangements (3-5) 3D-radiotherapy (RT) optimized plans. Twelve patients were included in this analysis. Four plans for each patient were compared in terms of dose-volume histograms, homogeneity index (HI), and conformity index (CI): (1) 3 equispaced beam arrangement 3D-RT; (2) 4 equispaced beam arrangement 3D-RT; (3) 5 equispaced beam arrangement 3D-RT; (4) step-and-shoot IMRT technique. CI showed a good discrimination between the four plans. The mean scores of CI were 0.58 (range: 0.38-0.67) for the 3F-CRT plan, 0.58 (range: 0.41-0.66) for 4F-CRT, 0.62 (range: 0.43-0.68) for 5F-CRT and 0.69 (range: 0.58-0.78) for the IMRT plan. A significant improvement of the conformity was reached by the IMRT plan (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). As expected, the increment of 3D-CRT fields was associated with an improvement of target dose conformity and homogeneity; on the contrary, in the IMRT plans, a better conformity was associated to a worse target dose homogeneity. A significant reduction in terms of D{sub mean}, V90%, V95%, V100% was recorded for rectal and bladder irradiation with the IMRT plan. Surprisingly, IMRT supplied a significant dose reduction also for rectum and bladder V30% and V50%. A significant dosimetric advantage of IMRT over 3D-RT in the adjuvant treatment of vaginal vault alone in terms of treatment conformity and rectum and bladder sparing is shown.

OSTI ID:
21333981
Journal Information:
Medical Dosimetry, Vol. 35, Issue 2; Other Information: DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2009.04.003; PII: S0958-3947(09)00047-8; Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); ISSN 0958-3947
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English