skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Pretreatment Serum Testosterone and Androgen Deprivation: Effect on Disease Recurrence and Overall Survival in Prostate Cancer Patients Treated With Brachytherapy

Journal Article · · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
 [1]; ;  [2];  [3]; ;  [2];  [4]
  1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA (United States)
  2. Schiffler Cancer Center and Wheeling Jesuit University, Wheeling, WV (United States)
  3. Puget Sound Healthcare Corporation, Group Health Cooperative, Seattle, WA (United States)
  4. Wheeling Hospital, Department of Pathology, Wheeling, WV (United States)

Purpose: Low testosterone has been implicated as a possible adverse prognostic factor in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. We evaluated the impact of pretreatment serum testosterone on survival after prostate brachytherapy. Methods and Materials: From October 2001 to November 2004, 619 patients underwent brachytherapy and 546 had a pretreatment serum testosterone level measured. Pretreatment serum testosterone levels were assigned by the following criteria: below-normal (n = 105), low normal (n = 246), mid normal (n = 132), high normal (n = 50), and above normal (n = 13). Median follow-up was 5.2 years. Cause of death was determined for each deceased patient. Results: Six-year biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS), cause-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) were 97.7%, 99.8%, and 89.2%. When comparing patients with low or low normal testosterone with those with average or higher testosterone, there was no significant difference in bPFS (97.6% vs. 98.4%; p = 0.72), CSS (99.8% vs. 100%; p = 0.72), or OS (88.9% vs. 90.8%; p = 0.73). Among patients with average and higher pretreatment testosterone, there was no significant difference in outcomes when comparing patients who did and did not receive androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). For patients with low or low normal testosterone levels, there was no significant difference in bPFS or CSS when comparing patients who did and did not receive ADT. However, there was a trend toward lower OS in patients with baseline lower testosterone levels who also received ADT (83.9% vs. 91.3%, p = 0.075). Conclusions: Low pretreatment testosterone levels alone did not affect disease recurrence or OS. Patients with baseline low testosterone who also were treated with ADT had a trend toward decreased OS.

OSTI ID:
21276908
Journal Information:
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics, Vol. 74, Issue 4; Other Information: DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.09.046; PII: S0360-3016(08)03522-0; Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); ISSN 0360-3016
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Whole-Pelvis Radiotherapy in Combination With Interstitial Brachytherapy: Does Coverage of the Pelvic Lymph Nodes Improve Treatment Outcome in High-Risk Prostate Cancer?
Journal Article · Mon Mar 15 00:00:00 EDT 2010 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:21276908

High-Risk Prostate Cancer With Gleason Score 8-10 and PSA Level {<=}15 ng/ mL Treated With Permanent Interstitial Brachytherapy
Journal Article · Tue Nov 15 00:00:00 EST 2011 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:21276908

Androgen Deprivation Therapy Does Not Impact Cause-Specific or Overall Survival in High-Risk Prostate Cancer Managed With Brachytherapy and Supplemental External Beam
Journal Article · Tue May 01 00:00:00 EDT 2007 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:21276908