skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Two approaches for the gravitational self-force in black hole spacetime: Comparison of numerical results

Journal Article · · Physical Review. D, Particles Fields
;  [1];  [2]
  1. School of Mathematics, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ (United Kingdom)
  2. Institute for Fundamental Theory, Department of Physics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611-8440 (United States)

Recently, two independent calculations have been presented of finite-mass ('self-force') effects on the orbit of a point mass around a Schwarzschild black hole. While both computations are based on the standard mode-sum method, they differ in several technical aspects, which makes comparison between their results difficult--but also interesting. Barack and Sago [Phys. Rev. D 75, 064021 (2007)] invoke the notion of a self-accelerated motion in a background spacetime, and perform a direct calculation of the local self-force in the Lorenz gauge (using numerical evolution of the perturbation equations in the time domain); Detweiler [Phys. Rev. D 77, 124026 (2008)] describes the motion in terms a geodesic orbit of a (smooth) perturbed spacetime, and calculates the metric perturbation in the Regge-Wheeler gauge (using frequency-domain numerical analysis). Here we establish a formal correspondence between the two analyses, and demonstrate the consistency of their numerical results. Specifically, we compare the value of the conservative O({mu}) shift in u{sup t} (where {mu} is the particle's mass and u{sup t} is the Schwarzschild t component of the particle's four-velocity), suitably mapped between the two orbital descriptions and adjusted for gauge. We find that the two analyses yield the same value for this shift within mere fractional differences of {approx}10{sup -5}-10{sup -7} (depending on the orbital radius)--comparable with the estimated numerical error.

OSTI ID:
21251148
Journal Information:
Physical Review. D, Particles Fields, Vol. 78, Issue 12; Other Information: DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.78.124024; (c) 2008 The American Physical Society; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); ISSN 0556-2821
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English